British Aerospace Tempest GR.1

Started by CammNut, December 04, 2013, 04:41:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

CammNut

Thanks folks, it was a fun build.

I assume the model is based on the P.1214 three-view line drawing that is out there and, yes, the horizontal tail is too big. But in conceptual design tail sizing is a black art, an educated guess. Aircraft evolve during development and tails quite often get bigger - look at the Harrier's tailpane versus the P.1127's. With heavy weapon loads under a forward-swept wing I can easy see the need arising for a bigger tail, or so I tell myself.

And the boom shaping is pretty generic, and a bit odd in places. I see the P.1216 would have had interchangeable weapons packs that bolted on to the fronts of the booms, which is cool.

I debated where to attach the weapons. Wingtip missiles on a forward-swept wing disturb the aerodynamicist in me as I am not sure they would provide the drag benefit that they do on an aft-swept wing, because the flow at the tips is going inward, not outward. Hanging them under the wing meant putting the stores fairly close together, but I used the plyon spacing from the Harrier GR.5 to quel the rebel nit-picking "realist" in me.

Old Wombat

OK, I'm an ignoramus, I can see it being a STOL aircraft but where is the VTOL element in the P.1214? :-\

However, I love the design & you've done it serious justice, CammNut! :thumbsup:

:cheers:

Guy
Has a life outside of What-If & wishes it would stop interfering!

"The purpose of all War is Peace" - St. Augustine

veritas ad mortus veritas est

Procopius

This is amazing. I'd been wondering about the WHIF potential of this kit.

Tophe

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Thorvic

Quote from: Old Wombat on December 05, 2013, 08:09:57 PM
OK, I'm an ignoramus, I can see it being a STOL aircraft but where is the VTOL element in the P.1214? :-\

However, I love the design & you've done it serious justice, CammNut! :thumbsup:

:cheers:

Guy

Well the three engine nozzles rotate through 90 degrees to generate vertical thrust and vents on the booms and wing tips add control much like the Harriers
Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

Old Wombat

Quote from: Thorvic on December 05, 2013, 10:41:02 PM
Quote from: Old Wombat on December 05, 2013, 08:09:57 PM
OK, I'm an ignoramus, I can see it being a STOL aircraft but where is the VTOL element in the P.1214? :-\

However, I love the design & you've done it serious justice, CammNut! :thumbsup:

:cheers:

Guy

Well the three engine nozzles rotate through 90 degrees to generate vertical thrust and vents on the booms and wing tips add control much like the Harriers

Cool! :mellow:

Thanks for that, now I know! :thumbsup:

:cheers:

Guy
Has a life outside of What-If & wishes it would stop interfering!

"The purpose of all War is Peace" - St. Augustine

veritas ad mortus veritas est

Army of One

I do like that......loads......great finish and load out...... :thumbsup:
BODY,BODY....HEAD..!!!!

IF YER HIT, YER DEAD!!!!

comrade harps

Oh wow  :o

If really built it would be an actual X plane.

Beautiful.
Whatever.

McColm


kitbasher

Great build sir.  :thumbsup:

Don't take this the wrong way though, but it's a such an ugly machine!

But not as bad as the Boeing X-32.
What If? & Secret Project SIG member.
On the go: Beaumaris/Battle/Bronco/Barracuda/F-105(UK)/Flatning/Hellcat IV/Hunter PR11/Hurricane IIb/Ice Cream Tank/JP T4/Jumo MiG-15/M21/P1103 (early)/P1127/P1154-ish/Phantom FG1/I-153/Sea Hawk T7/Spitfire XII/Spitfire Tr18/Twin Otter/FrankenCOIN/Frankenfighter

PR19_Kit

Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Thorvic

Quote from: PR19_Kit on December 07, 2013, 02:59:15 AM
Quote from: kitbasher on December 07, 2013, 02:09:34 AM
But not as bad as the Boeing X-32.

NOTHING'S as bad as an X-32!  :banghead: :banghead:

erm some of the P139 Gannet AEW replacement proposals in Admiralty & AEW perhaps ?

Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

Weaver

Nice build, and looks good in the pink!

I've heard a story to the effect that there was a particular individual "pushing" FSW to aerospace companies around the world in the early '80s. Most examined and then discarded it, BAe included, but they then put the P.1214 artwork out into the world as a disinformation exercise to divert attention away from the still secret and much more credible P.1216.

"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

CammNut

Thanks for all the great comments, folks.


The X-32 gets a bad rap, but the original Boeing AVX-70 concept from which was derived looked pretty cool, I think.

http://www.jsf.mil/images/gallery/ce/ce_001.jpg


Interestingly the X-32 used the same translating-cowl inlet concept intended for the P.1214/1216, while the X-35/F-35 uses the three-bearing swivel nozzle that would have been used for the vectoring rear nozzle in both "three-poster" designs.


And if you are interested in the P.1216, seems the 1/72 resin model was produced by Martin Higgs - looks quite a bit different.

http://ipmsuk.proboards.com/thread/9587

PR19_Kit

Quote from: CammNut on December 07, 2013, 07:35:37 AM
And if you are interested in the P.1216, seems the 1/72 resin model was produced by Martin Higgs - looks quite a bit different.

http://ipmsuk.proboards.com/thread/9587


That's almost an 'in house' model.  ;D

The builder was Martin_H and the masters were done by Thorvic, both fine upstanding members here.  ;D
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit