F-16 Dérivatives

[Tophe]

I may even try to illustrate your wrong reading, making it creative, thanks!

Here is the result, thanks!:

There would be a problem of airstream with the wing just after the canard, not staggered, and the wing should be more rear for good centering, but this is whif world!

[Tophe]

On my F-16 what-if site http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/f16ofil.htm
I add today a Draken Falcon or Falcon Draken
(the F-16XL was called a double delta like the J-35 Draken but it lacked the lateral air intakes):

[PR19_Kit]

That looks a LOT better than a 'normal' F-16, or even an XL too. 

[McColm]

Wow you've got every conceivable concept covered 

[Tophe]

Thanks a lot, both of you!

[Tophe]

And also with a thin front part was this sub-family (mixing F-16 and XQ-4):

(not very powerful means: cheap! export success?)

[Tophe]

The ancestor of the F-16 had no turbojet of course, but no enclosed canopy too (being so slow, no problem with the wind):

P.S. General Dynamics came from Convair that came from Consolidated-Vultee that came from Consolidated, maybe this is the source somehow.

[Tophe]

I have been inspired seeing one model of Unicraft http://www.unicraft.biz/on/sensor/sensor.htm :

[Tophe]

In 2012, I saw this old-style F-16 (then I forgot it):

[Tophe]

A mix of Falcon and Optica:

[PR19_Kit]

 

[Tophe]

Thanks!

More "seriously", here is the F-16TT which is a pilotless UAV:

[Tophe]

While most F-16s were dogfighters at less than Mach 2, there was a project of Mach 3 interceptor as well, without bubble canopy: 

[Tophe]

BAC/EE Lightning II? (instead of Lockheed F-22 Lightning II): 

[Tophe]

There was also a 4-engine-pod delta F-16: 

It was built and flown for real! (in my dream)