avatar_leptiprince

F-16 Dérivatives

Started by leptiprince, July 09, 2014, 02:06:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Tophe

Yes, I built the YFY-16J at https://www.whatifmodellers.com/index.php/topic,46131.0.html
calling it VTOF-16 Tailsit Falcon
before reinventing today with other missing links. :unsure: ;D

And I may add another VTOL Falcon, working like the Ryan X-13 Vertijet: <_<

I add it also on my site http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/f16ofil.htm
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

PR19_Kit

Oooh the Vertijet! There's an aeroplane for you.  :thumbsup:

Who'd have thought of hanging a whole aeroplane on a piece of string to enable it to take-off and land?  :o :o

I have two X-13 kits, and haven't built either of them yet.  :banghead:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Tophe

Quote from: PR19_Kit on December 19, 2020, 07:40:39 AM
I have two X-13 kits, and haven't built either of them yet.  :banghead:
You could build them together as a zwilling X-13Z  (good for stability ?) ;)
Of course, I may show you the equivalent in the F-16 family: <_<
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Marketing speech: :-\
- Our long double delta F-16XL is the best fighter in the World!
- Too much expensive! The Mirage 2000 is better!
- Look, we could make the F-16XL also small and simple delta: <_<
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

This F-16 had a great visibility but was not very solid: <_<
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Quote from: Tophe on December 16, 2020, 07:21:33 PM
8 engines in 2 pods to reach Mach 3:
With less ambition, 2 winged engines were considered (under/in/upon wings): <_<
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Sorry I forgot the way "engines far above the wing" (VFW-Fokker 614): <_<

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

I have discovered recently the F-16 DSI and I imagine a twin-jet version with 2 such large air intakes: <_<
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

There was also a 4-engined F-16 in this sub family: <_<
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Of course, a long time before the DSI air intake came, there were F-16 versions with 2 or 4 jets in the fuselage: <_<
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Quote from: Tophe on December 21, 2020, 10:11:53 PM
Sorry I forgot the way "engines far above the wing" (VFW-Fokker 614): <_<
There is also the YC-14 way with jets on the upper side of the wing (like Antonov An-72/74 too): <_<
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Instead of eating pebbles, the air intake could eat the pilot bailing out: <_<
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

There were many F-16 "in V" and related (U, W): <_<
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

from theChronicOne's topic https://www.whatifmodellers.com/index.php?topic=48759.15
Quote from: Tophe on December 28, 2020, 10:50:11 PM
I have tried to draw the profile view of TheChronicOne's model


As well with A-10 front part instead of T-38: <_<
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

I saw with Google a surprising F-16 partly hidden by a square... I keep it as a "different F-16"!


And in the country of the X-1 that broke the sound barrier, no need of air intake on the F-16, I think!

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]