avatar_leptiprince

F-16 Dérivatives

Started by leptiprince, July 09, 2014, 02:06:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Tophe

#675
 ;D (I don't understand precisely but probably this is the historical source of the word "fired out", no?)

And I have found another inspiring eggplane: <_<

= link http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/F-16drwG_ap.jpg

my F-16 what-if site is at http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/f16ofil.htm
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

For the drawing above, I was increasing the height of the F-16 canopy and it was pleasant, then I changed the rest to follow the Tiger way, but then (here below) I try to increase the height of the canopy only, with unchanged nose and fuselage, and this is pleasant for my taste already. Note: 450% = 144/32 but not in all directions, just for heights which is possible in CGI but not in plastic available kits... : <_<

= link http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/F-16drwG_ar.jpg
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

perttime

What if ... you also increased the fuselage height, but not as much as on the Tigeralcon?

Tophe

Uh, just to match the canopy, nowhere else.
While to make like Tiger Model, I increased all the fuselage together (maybe too much, maybe I should have let the rear jet separate, ahem...) :-\ :unsure: ;)
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

And I have recently discovered the Grumman Academe, inspiring for a big-radar F-16: <_<

= link http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/F-16drwG_au.jpg
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Personally, I prefer asymmetry than symmetry but I am often blamed for that, so below I try to cure the vertical asymmetry of the "normal" F-16 nose, to smile simply: <_<

= link http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/F-16drwG_av.jpg
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Extending the windscreen angle into the nose (without radar): <_<

= link http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/F-16drwG_aw.jpg
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Quote from: Tophe on May 31, 2022, 03:30:23 AM
Extending the windscreen angle into the nose (without radar): <_<
Opposite (and more streamlined, aerodynamic): extending the nose angle into the windscreen: <_<

= link http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/F-16drwG_ax.jpg
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

perttime


Tophe

Yes, increasing the top speed to Mach 2.7 with unchanged engine! ;)
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Now back to cartoon F-16, I have been very inspired by:
from https://www.whatifmodellers.com/index.php?topic=37210.3090
Quote from: perttime on June 02, 2022, 10:43:16 AM
Egg planes and toons are whifs. Right?
Dassault Etendard IV M ( #59 / Flottille 17F / Hyères, 1979 )

https://www.facebook.com/airpictures.fr/photos/a.1040615629291297/5594341297252018/
I like the look of the Etenhard and Super Etenhard. They don't look bad shortened a bit.
Here is a similar F-16, thanks!

= link http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/F-16drwG_ay.jpg
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Inpired by another jet toon of Air-Pictures.fr (a Rafale) I created another F-16: <_<

= link http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/F-16drwG_az.jpg
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

No more a cartoon but a F-16 without bubble canopy: <_<

= link http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/F-16drwG_ba.jpg
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

As I showed with the P-51Z family, there was a F-16Z zwilling-Falcon family, including very symmetric and very asymmetric prototypes: <_<

= link http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/F-16drwG_bb.jpg
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]