Aircraft that Britain Shouldn't have had

Started by DarrenP, July 17, 2014, 01:50:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

DarrenP

we have a thread aircraft the the UK should have had now what shouldn't they have bought?

Let me open with Tornado F3

maxmwill

The GD(your choice as to the meaning of that) F111

PR19_Kit

The Rivet Joints, Nimrod R4s would have done the job and cost us, the taxpayers, less.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

The Wooksta!

Spey engined Phantoms.  Or indeed ANY Phantom.
"It's basically a cure -  for not being an axe-wielding homicidal maniac. The potential market's enormous!"

"Visit Scarfolk today!"
https://scarfolk.blogspot.com/

"Dance, dance, dance, dance, dance to the radio!"

The Plan:
www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic

Old Wombat

Quote from: The Wooksta! on July 17, 2014, 04:15:02 PM
Spey engined Phantoms.  Or indeed ANY Phantom.

:o Everybody needs Phantoms! 'Coz ... 'coz, well ... well, they're just so big, brutish & outright cool! :bow:
Has a life outside of What-If & wishes it would stop interfering!

"The purpose of all War is Peace" - St. Augustine

veritas ad mortus veritas est

PR19_Kit

In the same era you'd probably have to add the Battle too, seriously underpowered and underarmed for the role it was pushed into.

Mind you, apart from moving Hampdens and Whitleys across to France I'm not sure what else could have been used.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Old Wombat

#6
If you want shouldn't haves, let's try the Fairey Battle & Fulmar, & the Blackburn Roc & Skua.









Late to the party, again! that's what happens when you do too many things at once! :rolleyes:
Has a life outside of What-If & wishes it would stop interfering!

"The purpose of all War is Peace" - St. Augustine

veritas ad mortus veritas est

Dizzyfugu

The Westland Whirlwind - at least with its crappy original engines.

andrewj

Quote from: Dizzyfugu on July 18, 2014, 12:33:11 AM
The Westland Whirlwind - at least with its crappy original engines.

But , the piots who flew them, loved them .

Andrew

Librarian

Quote from: Flyer on July 18, 2014, 05:44:43 AM
Quote from: Dizzyfugu on July 18, 2014, 12:33:11 AM
The Westland Whirlwind - at least with its crappy original engines.
I love the look of the Whirlwind, but you said at least with its crappy original engines, did they try other engines?

Huge fan of the Whirlwind but the problematic engines destroyed its career (and I vaguely remember some hostility from on high). Always wondered what could have been achieved with Merlins/Griffons.

Wasn't the Manchester ruined by poor engines too?

JayBee

Ah yes the wonderful Botha.
I remember reading that the official test report stated that "Entrance to this aircraft is difficult, it should be made impossible."  :rolleyes:
Alle kunst ist umsunst wenn ein engel auf das zundloch brunzt!!

Sic biscuitus disintegratum!

Cats are not real. 
They are just physical manifestations of collisions between enigma & conundrum particles.

Any aircraft can be improved by giving it a SHARKMOUTH!

kitnut617

#11
Quote from: Librarian on July 18, 2014, 05:53:07 AM
Huge fan of the Whirlwind but the problematic engines destroyed its career (and I vaguely remember some hostility from on high). Always wondered what could have been achieved with Merlins/Griffons.


Rolls Royce had a development plan for the Whirlwinds engines, but because they were instructed to concentrate on the Merlin, that development had to be canned.   Up until the Westland Welkin got it's official name, it was called the Whirlwind Development Aircraft.  The Welkin had Merlins ---- so now you know what could have been achieved.  The downfall of the Welkin though was it's wing, no matter how much power the engines could produce, the wing had a maximum speed, anything over that speed, the wing shock stalled.  Westlands answer to that was to increase the chord length by 20% but by then the Air Ministry had lost interest in it, that and the fact the expected German high altitude attack didn't materialize ---

One of my projects in the works is to modify one of the Welkins I have, with this 20% increased wing, plus shortening the wing to make it into a heavy fighter --  I could see it as a pretty good 'Pacific' escort fighter as it could carry (and was tested with) a pair of 200 Gal drop tanks. If you know what the 200 Gal. tank looked like that the Beaufighter used, the Welkin carried two of them.
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

Mossie

TSR.2

There, I've said it.  It shouldn't have been built in the first place, but once it was we should have followed it through.
I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.

kitnut617

#13
Quote from: Flyer on July 18, 2014, 06:05:28 AM
Quote from: Librarian on July 18, 2014, 05:53:07 AM
Wasn't the Manchester ruined by poor engines too?
just looked it up and it used unreliable Rolls-Royce Vulture's, I alway's thought it used Merlin's...

also found:
Manchester II Projected version re-engined with a pair of Napier Sabre or Bristol Centaurus engines. None built.

unfortunate that version was never built, sounds like a great idea.

The idea of the Manchester was to be powered by two 2000+ hp engines, any of the engines you mention fall into that category.  One of the reasons the Manchester had such tall u/c was because it was supposed to swing a 16 foot diameter prop.  But the Vulture was only developed so far so by the time it was cancelled, it used a smaller diameter one.  Once again, the Vulture fell victim of the urgent requirement for Merlins.  I've read that the problems could have been fixed, incidentally, when the Vulture was installed in the Hawker Tornado, they didn't experience any problems with it.
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

NARSES2

Kitnut beat me to the point re the Peregrine engine. In my world RR sort the problems out and the Whirwind sees much more extensive service.

As for the Welkin. The CM kit is in the pile of "next starts" as the resin part of the stash's contribution  ;D

Fairey Battle, Fulmar etc ? Rather unfair to judge them with hindsight in my opinion. You need to try and put your self into the minds of the people at the time. What were the expected requirements, what were the planned operational procedures/tactics, what were the opposition expected to do ; indeed who were they expected to be ?

Very, very few things survive the first shock of war. Then the problem is that you haven't the time and/or resources to sort out those failures which could be sorted out with a little bit of development.

It's all to easy to condemn from a safe distance
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.