Jet powered WW2 aircraft

Started by Jesse220, October 10, 2014, 02:34:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

loupgarou

Ahem, may I add 2 aircraft that have been neglected?
I had started the builds long ago, and wanted to wait to show the complete result, but this is the right occasion, I think.
Both aircraft have gotten a first coat of primer to check for faults, but I haven't updated photos, these are old ones..

JET AVENGER= AVENJET ?
As the real Avenger had been used also as night fighter, radar-equipped, it seemed logical to enhance the performances with jet engines, and the fuselage shape is very suited.
Kit is a russian Frog-spawn, and the jet exhaust from a Mig-9 ?? of uncertain east Europe origin, radar is a drop tank.
 

Ta 254.
Revell (or PM ??) Ta 154 fuselage, wings from a Plasticart 1/100 Il-28, undercarrige bays from an 1/00 Tamiya A-7.
     
Owing to the current financial difficulties, the light at the end of the tunnel will be turned off until further notice.

kitnut617

Quote from: perttime on October 11, 2014, 07:47:37 AM
Quote from: Cobra on October 10, 2014, 10:18:49 PM
Has Anyone thought about what a Jet Powered P-51 would look like?
There's a few ways it could go:
- 2 engines in wings (did someone build that?)
- Engine in tail. Tophe just drew a couple of examples: http://www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic,4461.msg654689.html#msg654689 - or just take FJ-1 as suggested.
- The Yak-15 way with engine low in the nose

Why re-invent it, North American already did it (like I said -- the FJ-1)
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

Zero-Sen

#17
Some experiments ...
SuperCorsair-Jumo004-and-Ta152-JTL.jpg

Tigercat-Jumojet-scale-o-rama.jpg

PRXX-Spitjet.jpg

PR19_Kit

That's the best looking jet Spitfire I've ever seen.  :thumbsup:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Jesse220

Those are very impressive. :thumbsup: And do you know what might be impressive? Is to see a jet version of the B-29 Super Fortress. ;)

Jesse220

Quote from: Flyer on October 11, 2014, 05:59:02 PM
Quote from: loupgarou on October 11, 2014, 02:00:15 PM

JET AVENGER= AVENJET ?
As the real Avenger had been used also as night fighter, radar-equipped, it seemed logical to enhance the performances with jet engines, and the fuselage shape is very suited.
Kit is a russian Frog-spawn, and the jet exhaust from a Mig-9 ?? of uncertain east Europe origin, radar is a drop tank.
 



I was considering doing something VERY similar to a Novo Vultee Vengeance :thumbsup:

Now that you mention it, I was thinking that to.

perttime


Jesse220

Has anybody thought about a F4U Corsair Jet? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

sandiego89

Quote from: PR19_Kit on October 11, 2014, 03:32:29 PM
That's the best looking jet Spitfire I've ever seen.  :thumbsup:

Agree, great looking spit.

I do think a bifurcated jet pipe (perhaps best known in the Sea Hawk) solution is workable for many types.  I went that route on my WHIF P-38, which is no where near the quality of the spit, but offers a solution of getting around a firewall or wheel well. 

 





Dave "Sandiego89"
Chesapeake, Virginia, USA

wuzak

I figured a jet P-38 would have the jet in the central nacelle.

Zero-Sen

#25
Quote from: sandiego89 on October 12, 2014, 12:59:13 PM
...
I do think a bifurcated jet pipe (perhaps best known in the Sea Hawk) solution is workable for many types.  I went that route on my WHIF P-38, which is no where near the quality of the spit, but offers a solution of getting around a firewall or wheel well. 
...
Seconded! And with steerable bifurcated jet pipes you can even imagine some early STOL aircraft as I used on my Bronco Jet design.

A couple more ...

Rough sketch of a Mustang derivative.
XP51X-pegasus.jpg

Yak style (not quite WW2) ...
Whatif_Nennig_J1_Criquet_jetracer_2.jpg

ChipJet.jpg

zenrat

Quote from: wuzak on October 12, 2014, 01:35:30 PM
I figured a jet P-38 would have the jet in the central nacelle.

With the pilot in the front of one boom and many guns in the front of the other?
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

Jesse220

Quote from: zenrat on October 12, 2014, 02:50:18 PM
Quote from: wuzak on October 12, 2014, 01:35:30 PM
I figured a jet P-38 would have the jet in the central nacelle.

With the pilot in the front of one boom and many guns in the front of the other?

Not a bad idea, I want to see a jet powred P-38

sandiego89

Quote from: wuzak on October 12, 2014, 01:35:30 PM
I figured a jet P-38 would have the jet in the central nacelle.

Normally yes, but not under the premise of my "project Bunsen" WHIF entry, which called for a crash program to fit existing early jet engines to existing fighters with absolute minimal modifications to the structure- so really limited to what your could bolt on to the firewall. So two early jet engines of limited power replaced the two allisions.

http://www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic,38594.msg632566.html#msg632566
Dave "Sandiego89"
Chesapeake, Virginia, USA

Jesse220

Quote from: sandiego89 on October 12, 2014, 06:43:49 PM
Quote from: wuzak on October 12, 2014, 01:35:30 PM
I figured a jet P-38 would have the jet in the central nacelle.

Normally yes, but not under the premise of my "project Bunsen" WHIF entry, which called for a crash program to fit existing early jet engines to existing fighters with absolute minimal modifications to the structure- so really limited to what your could bolt on to the firewall. So two early jet engines of limited power replaced the two allisions.

http://www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic,38594.msg632566.html#msg632566

That is nice :cheers: