35 Megaton Titan II Warhead

Started by KJ_Lesnick, October 25, 2014, 04:49:01 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

KJ_Lesnick

RLBH

QuoteProbably a derivative of the B41 physics package
That would make sense as it was such an efficient weapon

Quotethat developed 25 megatons on just over 10,000 lbs.
Yes, it's actually the most efficient nuclear bomb we ever built.  It's design was quite creative

  • Lithium Deuteride boosted primary
  • Secondary lithium deuteride (fusion) secondary
  • Tertiary lithium deuteride (fusion) tertiary stage (only one of it's type)
  • Fast fission jacket
.
QuoteAround this time, it was reckoned that 100 megatons could be done with a B-52-carried weapon if testing was allowed - and SAC reckoned that it could be useful.  :blink:
From the statistics I remember reading in the article they said a 35 megaton warhead could be produced in a 3700 kg warhead, a 50-70 megaton warhead for B-52 use provided no testing was used (just current knowledge).  If testing was allowed they may very well have been able to do it: In fact, if the megaton/metric ton ratio stayed the same this would yield approximately the following

  • 9.46 megatons/metric ton
  • 3,700 kg/8,157.094 lb; Yield: 35 megatons
  • 5,285.714 kg/11,652.99 lb; Yield: 50 megatons
  • 7,400 kg/16,314.188 lb; Yield: 70 megatons
  • 10,571.429 kg/23,305.983 lb: 100 megatons
Some of these would be within the practical load (~10,000 pounds) the B-52 could carry, and definitely within the maximum load (43,000 pounds)

  • 4 x Nuclear Warheads with a maximum weight in the ballpark of 10,000 pounds (4 x B28?)
  • 2 x W39: 12,460 - 12,800 lbs
  • 1 x B53: 8,850 lbs
  • 1 x Mk41: 10,611 lbs
That being said, I'd like to remind everybody in a manner reminiscent of the SNL bit on Julian Assange, that no matter how I die: It was murder (even if there was a suicide note or a video of me peacefully dying in my sleep); should I be framed for a criminal offense or disappear, you know to blame.

Hobbes

Quote from: zenrat on October 28, 2014, 12:57:44 AM
What size blast would it take to shift the earth's orbit?


Now that would boggle the mind. Moving 1024kg takes quite a few zeroes more than 100 MT. 

scooter

Quote from: Hobbes on December 14, 2014, 04:23:54 AM
Quote from: zenrat on October 28, 2014, 12:57:44 AM
What size blast would it take to shift the earth's orbit?


Now that would boggle the mind. Moving 1024kg takes quite a few zeroes more than 100 MT. 
Here's a handy and fun web-based utility to play billiards with the Earth- Impact Earth

And just playing around, the impact results of a small, rocky, iron-cored planet impacting the Earth at 72 km/s into 900m deep water-

High res here

And for Nuclear Doomsday, here's a handy Google Maps based Nukemap
The F-106- 26 December 1956 to 8 August 1988
Gone But Not Forgotten

QuoteOh are you from Wales ?? Do you know a fella named Jonah ?? He used to live in whales for a while.
— Groucho Marx

My dA page: Scooternjng

pyro-manic

Some of my models can be found on my Flickr album >>>HERE<<<

scooter

The F-106- 26 December 1956 to 8 August 1988
Gone But Not Forgotten

QuoteOh are you from Wales ?? Do you know a fella named Jonah ?? He used to live in whales for a while.
— Groucho Marx

My dA page: Scooternjng

zenrat

Let me get this straight Lister, you're planning to play pool with planets?

Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..