avatar_seadude

Ships and planes in space.

Started by seadude, December 03, 2014, 01:43:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

pyro-manic

Quote from: steelpillow on December 07, 2014, 09:16:15 AM
The X-15 was the first genuine spaceplane, albeit it needed a launch carrier

Now there's a thought - X-15 on top of a big booster for ground launches?
Some of my models can be found on my Flickr album >>>HERE<<<

steelpillow

Quote from: pyro-manic on December 07, 2014, 01:43:41 PM
Quote from: steelpillow on December 07, 2014, 09:16:15 AM
The X-15 was the first genuine spaceplane, albeit it needed a launch carrier

Now there's a thought - X-15 on top of a big booster for ground launches?

Would look good on the back of an XB-70 Valkyrie too. Wonder how much higher/faster that would get it than the B-52 drop.
Cheers.

kerick

I've always liked the Dynasoar. A lot whole bunch of these ready to launch as space interceptors would look very GA.
" Somewhere, between half true, and completely crazy, is a rainbow of nice colours "
Tophe the Wise

PR19_Kit

Quote from: steelpillow on December 08, 2014, 11:30:13 AM
Would look good on the back of an XB-70 Valkyrie too. Wonder how much higher/faster that would get it than the B-52 drop.

Now THAT'S a neat idea, and I have both kits in The Loft too............  ;)
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Weaver

An X-15 would look good slung under a B-58 too.
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

Mossie

#35
Quote from: steelpillow on December 08, 2014, 11:30:13 AM
Quote from: pyro-manic on December 07, 2014, 01:43:41 PM
Quote from: steelpillow on December 07, 2014, 09:16:15 AM
The X-15 was the first genuine spaceplane, albeit it needed a launch carrier

Now there's a thought - X-15 on top of a big booster for ground launches?

Would look good on the back of an XB-70 Valkyrie too. Wonder how much higher/faster that would get it than the B-52 drop.

The X-15B would have been orbital.  Here's one of several proposed booster configurations, no less than four Titans:
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,230.0.html (more on this thread)


Saturn boosters:


And for steelpillow, something that looks very like a Valkyrie wing, albiet on the forward fuselage:
I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.

PR19_Kit

Woudn't an X-15 have been the wrong shape to return safely from orbit?

It had no heatshield as such and wasn't curved on the underside like the lifting body craft.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

jcf

Launching from the back of a Valkyrie was proposed for the stretched delta-winged X-15.


Mossie

Quote from: PR19_Kit on December 08, 2014, 02:02:43 PM
Woudn't an X-15 have been the wrong shape to return safely from orbit?

It had no heatshield as such and wasn't curved on the underside like the lifting body craft.

There's a good article here regarding the X-15's problems.  If I've understood correctly, the idea was to slow it down enough to enter the residual atmosphere, where it would quickly reach similar speeds to the X-15:
https://falsesteps.wordpress.com/2012/09/15/x-15b-shortcut-to-space/
I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.

steelpillow

Quote from: joncarrfarrelly on December 08, 2014, 02:19:12 PM
Launching from the back of a Valkyrie was proposed for the stretched delta-winged X-15.



Brilliant! To think that some bureaucrat actually had sufficient Vogon blood in his ancestry to squash the idea. Anybody got any links?
Cheers.

steelpillow

Quote from: PR19_Kit on December 08, 2014, 02:02:43 PM
Woudn't an X-15 have been the wrong shape to return safely from orbit?

It had no heatshield as such and wasn't curved on the underside like the lifting body craft.

The main shape requirement is to "pancake" down as flat-on as you can, with no sharp sticky-out bits. An X-15 falling underside-down would be a good shape to work with. The lifting bodies were if anything worse, having no wing area - the characteristic body shape is to do with flight at subsonic speeds when you have no wings - so if anything would have needed even more heat shielding.

The X-15 pioneered the use of what is called an ablative coating. It's basically a thick paint that heats up and falls off, carrying the heat away with it. It left a terrible mess behind as it blew back over the airframe, so they didn't like using it. I guess they could have resorted back to it. Another early idea, with I think the Dyna-soar but I could be wrong, was a jettisonable heat shield that sat underneath during re-entry and then got tossed away before landing.
Cheers.

Captain Canada

CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

PR19_Kit

Hmm, does anyone do a conversion for that longer, delta X-15? Or would a set of Fairey FD2 wings do?
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

steelpillow

Quote from: PR19_Kit on December 09, 2014, 11:34:39 AM
Hmm, does anyone do a conversion for that longer, delta X-15? Or would a set of Fairey FD2 wings do?

If you are into 1:144 scale resin kits you don't need to convert it: http://www.hannants.co.uk/product/ANIG4007
They throw in a free Valkyrie to the same scale too.  ;)
Totally out of my price range though :(

FD2 wings have less sweepback of the leading edge and a much shorter root chord. You'd need to find a bigger wing and cut it down.

Cheers.

scooter

Quote from: steelpillow on December 09, 2014, 12:31:03 PM
FD2 wings have less sweepback of the leading edge and a much shorter root chord. You'd need to find a bigger wing and cut it down.

Starfighter wing in 1/72 or 1/48 then?
The F-106- 26 December 1956 to 8 August 1988
Gone But Not Forgotten

QuoteOh are you from Wales ?? Do you know a fella named Jonah ?? He used to live in whales for a while.
— Groucho Marx

My dA page: Scooternjng