CVA-01 1970

Started by rickshaw, December 22, 2014, 01:50:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

rickshaw

Does anybody know what the air group markings for the original CVA-01 in the 1960s were going to be?

I have an FAA build which would do nicely on her decks...
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

Thorvic

Trust an Aussie to drop their A's !!! -  ;D Its CVA-01

The Air group as far as I can work would have been 893 Squadron and 801 squadron from Victorious as the ship would have replaced HMS Victorious (The Airgroup actually transferred to Hermes after the refit fire caused her to be scrapped early and Hermes squadron went to shore based HQ units before disbanding).

Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

PR19_Kit

What about some AEW3 Gannets from a flight of 849 Sqdn.?
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Thorvic

#3
Quote from: PR19_Kit on December 22, 2014, 09:07:30 AM
What about some AEW3 Gannets from a flight of 849 Sqdn.?

That would be 849 A flight and the ASW choppers were 814 sqdn
Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

Captain Canada

Mmmm....this is gonna be cool. Love that era !

:wub: :tornado: :cheers:
CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

PR19_Kit

Quote from: Thorvic on December 22, 2014, 01:12:08 PM
Quote from: PR19_Kit on December 22, 2014, 09:07:30 AM
What about some AEW3 Gannets from a flight of 849 Sqdn.?

That would be 848 A flight and the ASW choppers were 814 sqdn

Why 848? They never were an AEW unit, whereas 849 have been a solely AEW unit since the end of WWII?
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

rickshaw

Actually, Aussies often their drop their "h"s.

OK, CVA-01, then.

Actually what I was more after was an explanation of what the aircraft's markings would be, say for the fighter squadron which was going to be assigned.  Do you know, Geoff?
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

Thorvic

Quote from: PR19_Kit on December 22, 2014, 05:23:21 PM
Quote from: Thorvic on December 22, 2014, 01:12:08 PM
Quote from: PR19_Kit on December 22, 2014, 09:07:30 AM
What about some AEW3 Gannets from a flight of 849 Sqdn.?

That would be 848 A flight and the ASW choppers were 814 sqdn

Why 848? They never were an AEW unit, whereas 849 have been a solely AEW unit since the end of WWII?

Typo Kit
Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

Thorvic

Quote from: rickshaw on December 22, 2014, 08:14:57 PM
Actually, Aussies often their drop their "h"s.

OK, CVA-01, then.

Actually what I was more after was an explanation of what the aircraft's markings would be, say for the fighter squadron which was going to be assigned.  Do you know, Geoff?

The markings would have followed what was used on the Sea Vixen, for 893 and Buccaneer for 801. It was only the news of the doom of the FAA and 892 would be the last combat unit that prompted the switch to the Omega scheme we are familar with on Arks Phantoms.
Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

TallEng

This link should help with 893NAS markings :thumbsup:
http://www.seavixen.org/image-gallery/893-squadron/category/6-893-sqn
Loads of atmospheric photos of Sea Vixens  :wub:

Regards
Keith
The British have raised their security level from "Miffed" to "Peeved". Soon though, security levels may be raised yet again to "Irritated" or even "A Bit Cross". Londoners have not been "A Bit Cross" since the Blitz in 1940 when tea supplies ran out for three weeks

rickshaw

TallEng, thanks for the link, some nice pictures there.

Geoff, tell me, do you know what the letter code on the fin was going to be for the CVA-01 fighter squadron?
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

PR19_Kit

Quote from: rickshaw on December 24, 2014, 01:06:05 AM
TallEng, thanks for the link, some nice pictures there.

Geoff, tell me, do you know what the letter code on the fin was going to be for the CVA-01 fighter squadron?

It would have depended on the eventual name of the ship, wouldn't it?
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

TallEng

I believe that's how it works :thumbsup:
E for Eagle, V for Victorious, C for Centaur etc etc.
I think CVA-01 would have been HMS Queen Elizabeth :rolleyes:
And CVA-02 HMS Duke of Edinburgh :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Regards
Keith
The British have raised their security level from "Miffed" to "Peeved". Soon though, security levels may be raised yet again to "Irritated" or even "A Bit Cross". Londoners have not been "A Bit Cross" since the Blitz in 1940 when tea supplies ran out for three weeks

rickshaw

So "Q" or "E" or "QE"?
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

TallEng

My guess would be 'Q'

Regards
Keith
The British have raised their security level from "Miffed" to "Peeved". Soon though, security levels may be raised yet again to "Irritated" or even "A Bit Cross". Londoners have not been "A Bit Cross" since the Blitz in 1940 when tea supplies ran out for three weeks