do big guns have a modern role?

Started by eatthis, December 30, 2014, 01:24:15 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

eatthis

Quote from: deathjester on December 31, 2014, 06:14:16 AM
Someone clearly knows how, as US aircraft carriers have armoured hulls!
anyway, Rail guns, anyone?

how much armour do they have?
and yeh railguns are an idea and what about smart shells?
custom made pc desks built to order (including pc inside the the desk)

https://www.etsy.com/uk/your/listings?ref=si_your_shop

http://tinypic.com/m/hx3lmq/3

NARSES2

Quote from: deathjester on December 31, 2014, 06:14:16 AM
Someone clearly knows how, as US aircraft carriers have armoured hulls!
anyway, Rail guns, anyone?

Yup. In theory armour plate is not to difficult to manufacture. However you don't know how well you've done it until it's tested. I know that Chieftain turrets used to be taken off the line and taken to the ranges and used as target practice in order to ensure the manufacturing standards were ok. A mate was shop manager and he swore the guys from the MOD deliberately picked the ones they'd nearly finished rather then the most recent rough casts at the start of the line  :banghead:

I assume the US Navy tests in the same destructive way ?
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Hobbes

#32
Quote from: deathjester on December 31, 2014, 06:14:16 AM
Someone clearly knows how, as US aircraft carriers have armoured hulls!

To some extent, yes, but nowhere near the levels of a battleship. Those had armor belts thick enough to stop 16" shells (or on that order), meaning they had 20" of steel plate in some places, and the entire ship was armored. Nimitz-class carriers have 2" of Kevlar around vital spaces, to limit the damage done by antiship missiles. That's much easier to fabricate.

Captain Canada

My world will always have a place for big guns ! Especially shore based. Cheap (ish) last ditch defence.

:cheers:
CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

kerick

I can see guns on a ship to support an amphibious landing. Rail guns lobbing 8" shells from well off shore might be useful. Its not as bad as it used to be when a few clouds in the right places could really hamper air support but having something that could lay down some firepower no matter the conditions could be very useful.
" Somewhere, between half true, and completely crazy, is a rainbow of nice colours "
Tophe the Wise

Martin H

Quote from: NARSES2 on December 31, 2014, 06:43:21 AM
Quote from: deathjester on December 31, 2014, 06:14:16 AM
Someone clearly knows how, as US aircraft carriers have armoured hulls!
anyway, Rail guns, anyone?

Yup. In theory armour plate is not to difficult to manufacture. However you don't know how well you've done it until it's tested. I know that Chieftain turrets used to be taken off the line and taken to the ranges and used as target practice in order to ensure the manufacturing standards were ok. A mate was shop manager and he swore the guys from the MOD deliberately picked the ones they'd nearly finished rather then the most recent rough casts at the start of the line  :banghead:

I assume the US Navy tests in the same destructive way ?

Well they did wait until the USS America (CV66) was retired. USS America wikipedia page

They spent four weeks throwing every thing they could bar nukes at her before she was scuttled.

The video footage is apparently very heavily classified as it would be foolish to allow any one else to see what it would really take to sink a super carrier. It pays to keep em guessing. 

She now holds the record of being the largest ship ever to have been deliberately sunk.
I always hope for the best.
Unfortunately,
experience has taught me to expect the worst.

Size (of the stash) matters.

IPMS (UK) What if? SIG Leader.
IPMS (UK) Project Cancelled SIG Member.

zenrat

Quote from: PR19_Kit on December 31, 2014, 01:43:27 AM
Quote from: zenrat on December 30, 2014, 08:39:27 PM
Battleships - needed for when the aliens invade Hawaii.

You've been watching movies again, I know..........  ;)

It's one of Mrs z's favourites.  I think because unusually for movies you can pinpoint the date exactly (during RIMPAC 2012) and we were there then.
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

proditor

All other methods of modernization aside, if you want to reduce the crew by 270, you remove the twin 5" turrets. Each has a crew of 27. If you want to retain the medium caliber, you replace the mount with old 5"/54 that were replaced with 5:/62s. New crew, 6 per mount. 2 mounts per side, net savings with this and no other attempts to reduce crew, roughly 250 crew.

zenrat

27!?
Do you have a breakdown of what they all do?
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

pyro-manic

Turret captain, gunlayers, aimers, gun crew for each gun, plus a sizeable magazine crew handling shells and charges. The main battery turrets had a crew of almost a hundred.
Some of my models can be found on my Flickr album >>>HERE<<<

zenrat

Thanks Pyro.  I was picturing all 27 crammed into one turret...
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

scooter

Quote from: zenrat on January 16, 2015, 04:38:41 PM
Thanks Pyro.  I was picturing all 27 crammed into one turret...

Its not a Beetle, for pete's sake...
The F-106- 26 December 1956 to 8 August 1988
Gone But Not Forgotten

QuoteOh are you from Wales ?? Do you know a fella named Jonah ?? He used to live in whales for a while.
— Groucho Marx

My dA page: Scooternjng

NARSES2

Quote from: scooter on January 16, 2015, 05:12:46 PM
Quote from: zenrat on January 16, 2015, 04:38:41 PM
Thanks Pyro.  I was picturing all 27 crammed into one turret...

Its not a Beetle, for pete's sake...

;D ;D

Yup it's easy to forget all those guys working in the magazines etc.

A couple of WWII films give you a good feel of the number of people involved in getting even a destroyers main guns into action. "In Which We Serve" is one.
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

DarrenP

big gun's have large Projectiles that can be used to carry other payloads than explosive, like Jammers or multiple projectiles and definitely good for land operations

kitnut617

Quote from: zenrat on January 15, 2015, 01:43:37 AM
27!?
Do you have a breakdown of what they all do?


tank turret  ----   battleship turret

If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike