Messerschmitt Bf 109H-12 trainer finished

matrixone · March 12, 2015, 10:25:42 AM

One of my small scale Messerschmitts is finished, this one is the MPM 1/72 scale Bf 109H and it was converted into the two seat trainer version which makes this a what-if.

Here are some snaps of the finished model...

Matrixone

Tophe · March 12, 2015, 11:26:08 AM

Quote from: matrixone on March 12, 2015, 10:25:42 AM
and it was converted into the two seat trainer version which makes this a what-if.

Great conversion! into a peaceful trainer?

su27rules · March 12, 2015, 02:56:30 PM

Nice, I like it!!

NARSES2 · March 13, 2015, 08:28:28 AM

That is very nice sir

Tophe · March 14, 2015, 04:50:32 AM

May I convert it into a (zwilling) mass-trainer for 3 students? with Photoshop or else, saying this comes from matrixone.

matrixone · March 14, 2015, 09:51:05 AM

Thanks guys!

Tophe,
Go ahead and change it up, I am curious to find out how it might look.

Matrixone

Tophe · March 14, 2015, 01:20:08 PM

Thanks Matrixone! Here is the Zwilling of it, twin-double-109...:

(if I removed the Swastika, it is not to blame the modeller that you are but because this sign is illegal in my country)

matrixone · March 15, 2015, 10:25:05 AM

That looks great Tophe, what an interesting aircraft!

Matrixone

Tophe · March 15, 2015, 11:09:52 AM

Thanks a lot! And congratulations again to you! I could make a 6-seat or 8-seat derivative, a push-pull derivative and many sorts of things... (I confess: I am a dreamer)

Tophe · March 16, 2015, 12:31:01 PM

Here is the 6-seat Messerschmitt Bf-109 super-trainer, thanks again!

NARSES2 · March 17, 2015, 09:04:20 AM

How long can we get ?

Tophe I was just wondering what the H-12 trainer would look like if the stabilizers went between the fins rather then just on the outside ?

Tophe · March 17, 2015, 10:33:43 PM

Yes, but... I have a little problem: matrixone source is a (good detailed) picture at short distance, thus having a strong conical effect, and making a Zwilling I just copied one as a second without having a big one in front and small one in the rear (as the conical effect would require), and... joining the 2 tails would show the problem, with a surprising angle not matching the one of the wing. With separate tails, on the opposite, it seems all right at first sight.
If I make the front one bigger, it will be blurred, because of interpolated pixels without precise source. If I make the distant one smaller, it will be blurred as well, because of averaged pixels. I may try just to show you, yes, and maybe having both front blurred and rear blurred could match, this is a good idea, thanks. (Maybe saturday, because now I must go to work, this is not fun time $:-\$

)...

NARSES2 · March 18, 2015, 08:28:06 AM

OK Tophe, didn't realise it was that complicated.

Tophe · March 18, 2015, 10:54:54 AM

Quote from: Tophe on March 17, 2015, 10:33:43 PM
I just copied one as a second without having a big one in front and small one in the rear (as the conical effect would require), and... joining the 2 tails would show the problem, with a surprising angle not matching the one of the wing.

Here is the basis, explained and shown, requiring much improvement:

Tophe · March 18, 2015, 11:40:00 AM

Quote from: Tophe on March 17, 2015, 10:33:43 PM
If I make the front one bigger, it will be blurred, because of interpolated pixels without precise source. If I make the distant one smaller, it will be blurred as well, because of averaged pixels. I may try just to show you, yes, and maybe having both front blurred and rear blurred could match, this is a good idea, thanks.

I found the time this evening to do a first try, then I could join the 2 tails.