avatar_Weaver

Alternative buys for New Zealand

Started by Weaver, April 03, 2015, 05:42:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

DarrenP2

my preference for the Skyhawk replacement would have been the Jaguar though with the strained french relations that might have been problematic

KJ_Lesnick

The F-5's were both good fighters and good bombers actually
That being said, I'd like to remind everybody in a manner reminiscent of the SNL bit on Julian Assange, that no matter how I die: It was murder (even if there was a suicide note or a video of me peacefully dying in my sleep); should I be framed for a criminal offense or disappear, you know to blame.

Weaver

Quote from: KJ_Lesnick on January 10, 2016, 02:03:15 PM
The F-5's were both good fighters and good bombers actually

Yes and no. Good payload and performance but lacking in serious avionics for the job. Clear-weather fighter-bomber basically.
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

DarrenP2

I wonder if the Hawk 100 and 200 would have been a good step down from Skyhawk allowing the RNZAF to keep some fast jet experience and providing a limited capability

rickshaw

Quote from: DarrenP2 on January 13, 2016, 02:25:24 AM
I wonder if the Hawk 100 and 200 would have been a good step down from Skyhawk allowing the RNZAF to keep some fast jet experience and providing a limited capability

They would have ensured that the RNZAF kept in fast jets, no matter what else.  If RNZAF had purchase 200s, the RAAF would also likely have.
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

KiwiZac

I was doing some random Googling at work the other day and stumbled upon this...I just so happened to build an RNZN, Maverick-armed Lynx HMA.8 a couple of years back!

From Flight Global, 11 September 1996:
New Zealand Navy chooses Lynx

THE ROYAL NEW Zealand Navy (RNZN) has completed its replacement naval helicopter evaluation and recommended selection of the LHTEC T800-powered Westland Super Lynx.

Sources in Westland and Kaman confirm that the RNZN's evaluation has favoured a Super Lynx. It is understood that the Navy's project office is now being wound down.

Final selection remains subject to political approval, and this has been postponed until after New Zealand's general election on 12 October. Deferring an official decision is also intended to bring the RNZN's programme in line with Australia's selection of a new naval helicopter, which is now scheduled, for mid-October.

The RNZN requires up to six helicopters to replace its fleet of Westland Wasps. With the Wasps due to be phased out by mid-1997, and the first of New Zealand's new ANZAC frigates due to enter service shortly, the Navy has asked to lease Royal Navy Lynx helicopters as a stop-gap measure.

Australia's project 1411/1427 calls for the purchase of 14 new shipboard helicopters, with an option for a further nine. The Royal Australian Navy's selection has been narrowed down to the Super Lynx and Kaman SH-2G Super SeaSprite.
Zac in NZ
#avgeek, modelbuilder, photographer, writer. Callsign: "HANDBAG"
https://linktr.ee/zacyates

Weaver

I bet they wish they had bought the Lynx!
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

Logan Hartke

New Zealand or Australia, Weaver?

Maybe I'm not super familiar with the situation, but I thought that New Zealand was fairly pleased with the SH-2Gs it operates. It was the Australians that had such a terrible experience and it seems to be as much their own fault in the procurement process as Kaman's. This seems to be borne out by the fact that New Zealand then snapped up the same helicopters that caused the Australians such headaches.

New Zealand's still convinced it got a good helicopter at a significantly lower cost than the Super Lynx, and I'm not sure they're wrong.

Cheers,

Logan

Weaver

Quote from: Logan Hartke on April 06, 2016, 02:57:54 PM
New Zealand or Australia, Weaver?

Maybe I'm not super familiar with the situation, but I thought that New Zealand was fairly pleased with the SH-2Gs it operates. It was the Australians that had such a terrible experience and it seems to be as much their own fault in the procurement process as Kaman's. This seems to be borne out by the fact that New Zealand then snapped up the same helicopters that caused the Australians such headaches.

New Zealand's still convinced it got a good helicopter at a significantly lower cost than the Super Lynx, and I'm not sure they're wrong.

Cheers,

Logan

Sorry, yes you're right. I was forgetting that NZ had a very different experience with the SH-2G than Aus.
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

rickshaw

The SH-2G experience was enough to make most RAN service people to shudder and it was, as you pointed out, Logan primarily a problem of their own making.  They thought they were getting cheap airframes at the end of the Cold War that the USN no longer wanted and then decided they'd like to upgrade their avionics to the latest standard.  They didn't have the experience and they keep changing the specifications so the whole project dragged on until it was canned (as it should have been) with only the cockpits upgraded.  The RNZN were quite happy to snaffle the half finished airframes and have been using them ever since.   We ended up with the NH90 instead.
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

wuzak

Quote from: rickshaw on April 06, 2016, 05:34:33 PM
The SH-2G experience was enough to make most RAN service people to shudder and it was, as you pointed out, Logan primarily a problem of their own making.  They thought they were getting cheap airframes at the end of the Cold War that the USN no longer wanted and then decided they'd like to upgrade their avionics to the latest standard.  They didn't have the experience and they keep changing the specifications so the whole project dragged on until it was canned (as it should have been) with only the cockpits upgraded.  The RNZN were quite happy to snaffle the half finished airframes and have been using them ever since.   We ended up with the NH90 instead.

Was that the program where Australia was paying a new helicopter price for upgraded '60s airframes?

Logan Hartke

Quote from: rickshaw on April 06, 2016, 05:34:33 PM
The SH-2G experience was enough to make most RAN service people to shudder and it was, as you pointed out, Logan primarily a problem of their own making.  They thought they were getting cheap airframes at the end of the Cold War that the USN no longer wanted and then decided they'd like to upgrade their avionics to the latest standard.  They didn't have the experience and they keep changing the specifications so the whole project dragged on until it was canned (as it should have been) with only the cockpits upgraded.  The RNZN were quite happy to snaffle the half finished airframes and have been using them ever since.   We ended up with the NH90 instead.

I thought you guys got the MH-60R for ASW? I live in Jacksonville, Florida, which is home to more MH-60Rs than anywhere else in the world as far as I know, so I see them in our skies on basically a daily basis. I also know a number of MH-60R pilots (was chatting with one of them at church on Sunday), and they seem to like it. Good piece of kit from what I understand, so I don't think you ended up at a bad place, you just took the long way to get there.

Cheers,

Logan

rickshaw

Quote from: wuzak on April 06, 2016, 06:13:14 PM
Quote from: rickshaw on April 06, 2016, 05:34:33 PM
The SH-2G experience was enough to make most RAN service people to shudder and it was, as you pointed out, Logan primarily a problem of their own making.  They thought they were getting cheap airframes at the end of the Cold War that the USN no longer wanted and then decided they'd like to upgrade their avionics to the latest standard.  They didn't have the experience and they keep changing the specifications so the whole project dragged on until it was canned (as it should have been) with only the cockpits upgraded.  The RNZN were quite happy to snaffle the half finished airframes and have been using them ever since.   We ended up with the NH90 instead.

Was that the program where Australia was paying a new helicopter price for upgraded '60s airframes?

Bascically it was more like new+another helicopter prices for a used 60s airframes.
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

rickshaw

Quote from: Logan Hartke on April 06, 2016, 06:17:08 PM
Quote from: rickshaw on April 06, 2016, 05:34:33 PM
The SH-2G experience was enough to make most RAN service people to shudder and it was, as you pointed out, Logan primarily a problem of their own making.  They thought they were getting cheap airframes at the end of the Cold War that the USN no longer wanted and then decided they'd like to upgrade their avionics to the latest standard.  They didn't have the experience and they keep changing the specifications so the whole project dragged on until it was canned (as it should have been) with only the cockpits upgraded.  The RNZN were quite happy to snaffle the half finished airframes and have been using them ever since.   We ended up with the NH90 instead.

I thought you guys got the MH-60R for ASW? I live in Jacksonville, Florida, which is home to more MH-60Rs than anywhere else in the world as far as I know, so I see them in our skies on basically a daily basis. I also know a number of MH-60R pilots (was chatting with one of them at church on Sunday), and they seem to like it. Good piece of kit from what I understand, so I don't think you ended up at a bad place, you just took the long way to get there.

And an expensive way to get there...   :banghead:
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

Weaver

Still, Lynxes for NZ and/or Aus would have been very credible and would make an interesting Whif.
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones