RAF Letter Markings

Started by KJ_Lesnick, April 05, 2015, 06:51:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

PR19_Kit

Or do a 'Crl-F' on the page and search by Squadron no. in the box that appears at the top.

AFAIK that works in almost any browser on the planet.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

TallEng

For books (much better) I would suggest Fighting Colours: R.A.F.Fighter Camouflage and Markings, 1937-75.
according to a well known internet book site about 15 of your English pounds ;D
And you'd probably also want Bombing Colours: British Bomber Camouflage and Markings, 1914-37
as well.
Regards
Keith
The British have raised their security level from "Miffed" to "Peeved". Soon though, security levels may be raised yet again to "Irritated" or even "A Bit Cross". Londoners have not been "A Bit Cross" since the Blitz in 1940 when tea supplies ran out for three weeks

PR19_Kit

Oh yes, I've almost worn the print off the pages of my two copies of those two. Veritable Bibles of RAF WWII Camo schemes.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

NARSES2

Thanks Mossie and Kit. It makes it easier but still a tad clumsy. Still can't have everything.

As a punishment for being a clot with the link plus not seeing the double arrows I attended Rad's birthday party Saturday  :blink: ;D
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

NARSES2

Quote from: TallEng on September 17, 2015, 08:16:36 AM
For books (much better) I would suggest Fighting Colours: R.A.F.Fighter Camouflage and Markings, 1937-75.
according to a well known internet book site about 15 of your English pounds ;D
And you'd probably also want Bombing Colours: British Bomber Camouflage and Markings, 1914-37
as well.
Regards
Keith

Thanks Keith, much prefer a book  :thumbsup:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Thorvic

Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

NARSES2

Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Captain Canada

I can't open that link ? Tried a few different ways, opened and closed my browser etc., Weird.

I a somewhat related note, I was lucky enough to see VR-A and Vera Lynn at Hamilton back in the 90s. That was very cool, and a lifelong memory. Wish I'd gotten a pic with her.

CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

PR19_Kit

#23
It doesn't work for me either.

Looking at the actual text of the link with a (quote) command it looks as if parts of the address are missing.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

NARSES2

#24
I copied it and pasted it into my browser and it worked. Tried to sort the link but couldn't so try this

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Combat-Codes-Explanation-Listing-Commonwealth/dp/1844156915
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

PR19_Kit

Ahah, all is now clear, thanks Chris.  :thumbsup:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Captain Canada

Thanks Chris. Interesting book for sure. And quite the price range as well ! I'll have to look into this one would be some interesting insight, that's for sure.

:cheers:
CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

Allan

who thinks that laboriously painting on letters to the fus was a great waste of time and resources?...what happend when a plane was sent to another squadron?  the letters were removed and replaced I suppose...another waste....perhaps like Japanese airplanes all that was really needed is the roundel

Librarian

Always felt the simplest and most logical system, if one is required, was the pre/and WWII USN system. Sqn no., type of mission, ac no. within squadron for eg a TBD with 6T1 ( or is it the other way round....ahha, a flaw ;D ). All those coloured stripes and bands were a bit too much but very beautiful.

Surprised no one adopted the Dewey system....

NARSES2

Quote from: Allan on September 30, 2015, 09:21:39 PM
who thinks that laboriously painting on letters to the fus was a great waste of time and resources?...what happend when a plane was sent to another squadron?  the letters were removed and replaced I suppose...another waste....perhaps like Japanese airplanes all that was really needed is the roundel

One of the problems with that is that the enemy could operate a captured example far more easily.

C&C did/does require positive ID. In an emergency you could get away with no codes but over a campaign I think they are needed. Plus there's the whole "espirit de corps" factor.

Just my tuppence worth
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.