avatar_Weaver

Soviet GB Poll ends tonight at 7.45pm UK time

Started by Weaver, May 21, 2017, 11:50:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Weaver

Ladies, gentlemen and small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri, the poll thread for the very spendid Soviet GB is now up and running, so please go and vote.

Poll Thread: http://www.whatifmodellers.com/index.php/topic,43781.0.html

Finished Builds Thread: http://www.whatifmodellers.com/index.php/topic,43329.0.html
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

PR19_Kit

It's impossible to pick only three, may I have a 14 vote extension please?  ;D
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

DogfighterZen

Quote from: PR19_Kit on May 21, 2017, 11:59:49 AM
It's impossible to pick only three, may I have a 14 vote extension please?  ;D

Same here... what a tough choice, had to start by checking the ones i felt that REALLY deserved to be voted and came up with 12... took me a bit to narrow that down to 3...  :banghead: Great work from everyone! :thumbsup:
"Sticks and stones may break some bones but a 3.57's gonna blow your damn head off!!"

Dizzyfugu

I feel there's a plan behind this harsh voting limit. Rule Six inmvolved? How much overload can a brain take? OMG...!

NARSES2

Have to agree it's very difficult. Amazing standard.

Well done to all  :thumbsup:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

PR19_Kit

Quote from: Dizzyfugu on May 22, 2017, 12:26:59 AM

I feel there's a plan behind this harsh voting limit. Rule Six inmvolved? How much overload can a brain take? OMG...!


Oooooooh, don't EVER mention Rule 6!!!!  :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Rheged

Only 3 votes?  AAAAAAAGH!!   Brain overload!!  My congratulations to all entrants, and thanks to Weaver for organising it........and I won't even mention the rule  following number 5.
"If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you....."
It  means that you read  the instruction sheet

JayBee

Yes three votes only was VERY hard to achieve.
I do see that there is still no transparency in the voting though.  :o
Alle kunst ist umsunst wenn ein engel auf das zundloch brunzt!!

Sic biscuitus disintegratum!

Cats are not real. 
They are just physical manifestations of collisions between enigma & conundrum particles.

Any aircraft can be improved by giving it a SHARKMOUTH!

Weaver

Quote from: JayBee on May 22, 2017, 12:01:37 PM
Yes three votes only was VERY hard to achieve.
I do see that there is still no transparency in the voting though.  :o

What do you mean?
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

Snowtrooper

Quote from: Weaver on May 22, 2017, 04:47:31 PM
Quote from: JayBee on May 22, 2017, 12:01:37 PM
I do see that there is still no transparency in the voting though.  :o
What do you mean?
We can't see the poll results after voting, unlike eg. in the 2017/2018 season GB poll.

Weaver

Quote from: Snowtrooper on May 23, 2017, 01:10:34 AM
Quote from: Weaver on May 22, 2017, 04:47:31 PM
Quote from: JayBee on May 22, 2017, 12:01:37 PM
I do see that there is still no transparency in the voting though.  :o
What do you mean?
We can't see the poll results after voting, unlike eg. in the 2017/2018 season GB poll.

It's an option the person who posts the poll can set, so it was my decision (AFAIK, there's no site policy on this).

My view is that showing the rolling results during the voting is only useful if somebody wants to vote for the most or least popular entry or otherwise vote 'tactically'. However 'tactical voting' shouldn't really be a factor in something like this. It's an aesthetic choice, on a leisure subject, with no prize at stake and no real-world consequences, therefore you should only be voting for the entries that you like the best, not the entries most or least likely to win. I think this gets the 'purest' result, goverened by what people actually like, rather than any other consideration. Actual entrants, and other people interested in the stats, will get to see them after the poll closes, so it's not like there's any information being ultimately witheld.
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

Old Wombat

Quote from: Weaver on May 23, 2017, 01:30:05 AM
Quote from: Snowtrooper on May 23, 2017, 01:10:34 AM
Quote from: Weaver on May 22, 2017, 04:47:31 PM
Quote from: JayBee on May 22, 2017, 12:01:37 PM
I do see that there is still no transparency in the voting though.  :o
What do you mean?
We can't see the poll results after voting, unlike eg. in the 2017/2018 season GB poll.

It's an option the person who posts the poll can set, so it was my decision (AFAIK, there's no site policy on this).

My view is that showing the rolling results during the voting is only useful if somebody wants to vote for the most or least popular entry or otherwise vote 'tactically'. However 'tactical voting' shouldn't really be a factor in something like this. It's an aesthetic choice, on a leisure subject, with no prize at stake and no real-world consequences, therefore you should only be voting for the entries that you like the best, not the entries most or least likely to win. I think this gets the 'purest' result, goverened by what people actually like, rather than any other consideration. Actual entrants, and other people interested in the stats, will get to see them after the poll closes, so it's not like there's any information being ultimately witheld.

Yup! :thumbsup:
Has a life outside of What-If & wishes it would stop interfering!

"The purpose of all War is Peace" - St. Augustine

veritas ad mortus veritas est

Thorvic

Quote from: Weaver on May 23, 2017, 01:30:05 AM
Quote from: Snowtrooper on May 23, 2017, 01:10:34 AM
Quote from: Weaver on May 22, 2017, 04:47:31 PM
Quote from: JayBee on May 22, 2017, 12:01:37 PM
I do see that there is still no transparency in the voting though.  :o
What do you mean?
We can't see the poll results after voting, unlike eg. in the 2017/2018 season GB poll.

It's an option the person who posts the poll can set, so it was my decision (AFAIK, there's no site policy on this).

My view is that showing the rolling results during the voting is only useful if somebody wants to vote for the most or least popular entry or otherwise vote 'tactically'. However 'tactical voting' shouldn't really be a factor in something like this. It's an aesthetic choice, on a leisure subject, with no prize at stake and no real-world consequences, therefore you should only be voting for the entries that you like the best, not the entries most or least likely to win. I think this gets the 'purest' result, goverened by what people actually like, rather than any other consideration. Actual entrants, and other people interested in the stats, will get to see them after the poll closes, so it's not like there's any information being ultimately witheld.

That's really the best way as a blind ballot, otherwise the voting can get distorted by either attracted to the front runners or trying to pep up the also ran's rather than an honest appraisal of the three build you prefer the most.

I must admit the number, range and quality of entries have been excellent this year and its been a well run and very popular GB.

Its worth remembering to keep the GB scope as broad and as open as possible to get member involved, too specific and restrictive a category can result in less engagement than others
Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

Weaver

Quote from: Thorvic on May 23, 2017, 02:55:02 AM

I must admit the number, range and quality of entries have been excellent this year and its been a well run and very popular GB.

Its worth remembering to keep the GB scope as broad and as open as possible to get member involved, too specific and restrictive a category can result in less engagement than others

Thanks, on behalf of all the mods.

There is of course, the perennial question of what the 'success' of a GB should be judged by: participation numbers or quality of entries. There have been some GBs which attracted a limited number of entries that still inspired interesting and valuable contributions.
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

Weaver

The Soviet GB Poll ends at 7.45pm UK time tonight folks  - get voting if you havn't yet!
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones