avatar_TomZ

Lockheed F-96 Brightstar

Started by TomZ, August 13, 2017, 10:58:09 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

TomZ



At the end of the 1940s the USAF was looking for a replacement for the Lockheed P-80 and early F-86 jet fighters. Lockheed offered what was in effect a scaled up P-80. In 1950 a contract was awarded for 4 prototypes of what was designated the Lockheed F-96 Brightstar.



On 3 November 1952, the first F-96A prototype conducted its first flight. The design of the prototypes had initially featured both Fowler flaps and a leading edge slot; this slot was discarded as unnecessary after trials with the prototypes and never appeared on subsequent production aircraft. Triangular fences were added near the wing roots during flight testing in order to improve airflow when the aircraft was being flown at a high angle of attack. A small batch of F-96A prototypes completed design and evaluation trials with series production of the F-96B beginning in 1953.



In total 1268 F-96s were delivered to the USAF. On top of that more than 800 were exported to the UK, Germany, Holland, Taiwan and Italy. The last F-96 was withdrawn from active service with the USAF in 1964.



http://airwar1946.nl/whif/L46-F96.htm

TomZ
http://airwar1946.nl/index.htm
Reality is an illusion caused by an alcohol deficiency

DogfighterZen

"Sticks and stones may break some bones but a 3.57's gonna blow your damn head off!!"

PR19_Kit

Cor, I like that, very plausible, but what are the model's components?

I recognise the Sabre tailplane mounting, and maybe some F-94 and F-80 bits around the nose, but I'd love to know how you 'mixed the pudding', it came out VERY well indeed.  :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Gondor

Quote from: PR19_Kit on August 13, 2017, 02:25:25 PM
Cor, I like that, very plausible, but what are the model's components?

I recognise the Sabre tailplane mounting, and maybe some F-94 and F-80 bits around the nose, but I'd love to know how you 'mixed the pudding', it came out VERY well indeed.  :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Looks like a lot of Lansen in there

Gondor
My Ability to Imagine is only exceeded by my Imagined Abilities

Gondor's Modelling Rule Number Three: Everything will fit perfectly untill you apply glue...

I know it's in a book I have around here somewhere....

Dizzyfugu

It is a Lansen...  ;)

Never expected that a simple, new paint scheme would work SO well.  :thumbsup:

TomZ

Quote from: Dizzyfugu on August 13, 2017, 11:43:51 PM
It is a Lansen...  ;)

It is indeed 100% Lansen. In 1/48 with decals of a F-86 Sabre.

Now of course I have a F-86 kit left and Lansen decals. Hmmmm..........

TomZ
Reality is an illusion caused by an alcohol deficiency

PR19_Kit

Quote from: TomZ on August 14, 2017, 02:03:49 AM
Quote from: Dizzyfugu on August 13, 2017, 11:43:51 PM
It is a Lansen...  ;)

It is indeed 100% Lansen. In 1/48 with decals of a F-86 Sabre.

Now of course I have a F-86 kit left and Lansen decals. Hmmmm..........

TomZ

Strewth, amazing how much a different paint job totally changes the character of an aircraft!  :o

And the Lansen always hides itself under a cloud of Swedish anonymity too, a greatly underrated aeroplane.  ;D
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

zenrat

Looks great.  The Lansen is a very handsome aircraft.
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

Dizzyfugu

And a big one, too. I wonder how well the decals match the more voluminous airframe?!

NARSES2

Quote from: PR19_Kit on August 14, 2017, 02:51:26 AM

Strewth, amazing how much a different paint job totally changes the character of an aircraft!  :o



Very true

Quote from: zenrat on August 14, 2017, 03:33:47 AM
Looks great.  The Lansen is a very handsome aircraft.


It is in that scheme. Lovely build  :thumbsup:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

PR19_Kit

After marvelling yet again at the Brightstar, I was wandering around in The Loft, as I'm prone to, and damn me, I found a Heller Lansen!  :thumbsup:

It really is a BIG aeroplane too, almost Phantom size, and nicely moulded as well. Maybe the Brightstar has given me some ideas about that...........  ;)
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

ChernayaAkula

Cheers,
Moritz


Must, then, my projects bend to the iron yoke of a mechanical system? Is my soaring spirit to be chained down to the snail's pace of matter?

63cpe


Glenn Gilbertson

What a great idea - it looks stunning! :thumbsup:

tamatea

The sleek outline really lends itself to the silver scheme... fits right in with those iconic early 1950s American designs. Very effective.