Boeing or Fokker ? on floats

Started by loupgarou, November 19, 2017, 09:58:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

loupgarou

Another - quick and dirty - small project: a floatplane version of a pre/early war fighter.
Still undecided between a Fokker D XXI (russian issue of the Frog one) or a Boeing P-26 (Revell), so I snapped both together before opening the sealed bags.
Floats from the Airfix Auster Antarctic.

Owing to the current financial difficulties, the light at the end of the tunnel will be turned off until further notice.

TheChronicOne

Fascinating................             If all the parts jive, I think a Floatin' Peashooter would be very interesting indeed. D.XI is a great idea, too, but the P-26 just looks.. so.....  like a P-26, know what I mean, Vern? 
-Sprues McDuck-

loupgarou

Quote from: TheChronicOne on November 19, 2017, 11:44:05 AM
Fascinating................             If all the parts jive, I think a Floatin' Peashooter would be very interesting indeed. D.XI is a great idea, too, but the P-26 just looks.. so.....  like a P-26, know what I mean, Vern?

I agree.  <_< I have already started some glueing of P-26 parts. Obviously it will an export version, should be Model 281, so Model 281W ?
Owing to the current financial difficulties, the light at the end of the tunnel will be turned off until further notice.

jcf

The P-26 will be cool, kind of H-P Type S like, which was actually ordered by the USN as a carrier aircraft, two
completed, the S-1 and S-2, the S-3 floatplane was not completed.




loupgarou

#4
Also this build is moving on.
Had to sand the P-26, surface detail was terrifying, and cut some float struts using the original spats as template.



EDIT: modified inserting full-size image.
Owing to the current financial difficulties, the light at the end of the tunnel will be turned off until further notice.

ericr


loupgarou

Also the little critter is advancing.
Float supports, based on the spat shape, have been glued, now I'll have to decide how far forward or back to glue the floats.
I don0t really know how to calculate a balance point.  :rolleyes:

Owing to the current financial difficulties, the light at the end of the tunnel will be turned off until further notice.

PR19_Kit

Quote from: loupgarou on December 09, 2017, 12:46:00 AM

I don0t really know how to calculate a balance point.  :rolleyes:


What looks right IS right..............  :thumbsup:

I'd put the engine in place first and imagine its heaviness.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

loupgarou

Quote from: PR19_Kit on December 09, 2017, 12:50:19 AM
Quote from: loupgarou on December 09, 2017, 12:46:00 AM

I don0t really know how to calculate a balance point.  :rolleyes:


What looks right IS right..............  :thumbsup:

I'd put the engine in place first and imagine its heaviness.

Thanks. In my tests I was completely forgetting about the engine!  :banghead:  :rolleyes:
Owing to the current financial difficulties, the light at the end of the tunnel will be turned off until further notice.

perttime

Find a picture of an airplane with similar configuration, from about the same period - and eyeball it.

ericr

Quote from: perttime on December 09, 2017, 01:35:16 AM
Find a picture of an airplane with similar configuration, from about the same period - and eyeball it.
:thumbsup: ;)

loupgarou

Quote from: perttime on December 09, 2017, 01:35:16 AM
Find a picture of an airplane with similar configuration, from about the same period - and eyeball it.

Yes, thanks to Joncarrfarrelly, I have already one (a few posts higher).  <_<
Owing to the current financial difficulties, the light at the end of the tunnel will be turned off until further notice.

zenrat

From what i've read a general rule of thumb is that the step of the float(s) should be under the centre of lift of the wings.
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..