avatar_TheChronicOne

Langley Hypothetical Airplane

Started by TheChronicOne, September 30, 2018, 04:44:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

TheChronicOne

I stumbled across this the other day. I didn't devote eons of time to searching, but I couldn't really find much information about it....

It's definitely weird.


Photo Credit: MIRIAM WEINBERG



Photo Credit: DONALD HUEBLER  "TROPHY PRESENTATION WITH NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER DIRECTOR DR D HEARTH AND NASA LEWIS RESEARCH CENTER DIRECTOR DR JAMES MCCARTHY"


More here: https://picryl.com/media/langley-hypothetical-airplane-86eef2   


Anyone know anything about this jive contraption?  The site there says the pictures were from 1980, and come from the United States National Archive.


:unsure: :o :mellow:



EDIT:    I feel as if I may have posted this in the wrong forum, so if one of yous mods guys see fit and/or know of a a better place to move it to, then by all means...


EDIT 2:   H2 is Hydrogen, right? So maybe they wanted to run this thing on water. . . ... ..    (yes I know water is "H2O" but water is the "fuel" used in "hydrogen" engines from what I understood.... that's why I said "run on water" instead of just "run on hydrogen" because you have to have teh water to get to teh hydrogen )
-Sprues McDuck-

jcf

H2 is gaseous hydrogen, so the joke is that the aircraft would be a huge
keg of hydrogen fueling the engines, note it also riffs on the strut-braced
wing and "multi finger" wingtip concepts (the correct designation escapes
me at the moment) that were being explored in the period. 

Strut-braced wing bizjet from 1980:
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19810002505.pdf

Weaver

Quote from: joncarrfarrelly on September 30, 2018, 10:41:15 PM
H2 is gaseous hydrogen, so the joke is that the aircraft would be a huge
keg of hydrogen fueling the engines, note it also riffs on the strut-braced
wing and "multi finger" wingtip concepts (the correct designation escapes
me at the moment) that were being explored in the period. 

Strut-braced wing bizjet from 1980:
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19810002505.pdf

That's interesting. The study, quite properly, keeps the aircraft configuration the same in all three versions apart from the actual wing, which is just what you need to make a comparison. However I wonder what would be possible if you had a free hand to design a strut-braced bizjet from scratch? A couple of things that I note are that the diameter of the engines' fan shrouds are about the same at the gap between the wing and the base of the strut, and that the strut-based configurations seem to make no provision to hold the landing gear that's been displaced from the baseline aircraft's low wing. This all makes me wonder if there would be an advantage in having a short lower wing to hold the undercarriage and mount the engines at it's tips, with the shroud of the latter enclosing a C-shaped strut in order to reduce the drag from 'naked' struts.
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

zenrat

Hydrogen burns producing water.  So you run on hydrogen and produce water as an exhaust.
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

NARSES2

Quote from: TheChronicOne on September 30, 2018, 04:44:00 PM

EDIT:    I feel as if I may have posted this in the wrong forum, so if one of yous mods guys see fit and/or know of a a better place to move it to, then by all means...



It's a good enough fit here mate, so I'll leave it  :thumbsup:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

TheChronicOne

#5
Fascinating stuff. Learned about the hydrogen, and as mentioned, now the keg makes sense.  ;D   The whole plane reminds me of a beverage system. The body itself, and the nose looks like like them pointy paper cups that go with water coolers.  ;D ;D ;D

I guess the stuff I heard about pertained more to fantasy auto engines. People would make "engines" that would run on water by turning it into hydrogen and somehow it made the engine go. Last I checked, they never were efficient enough to provide even a little bit of power. Different beast altogther I guess and no wonder they didn't consider it because it simply does't work. Mythbusters even tested one and it was just a pile of crap.  ;D

Strut wings? I'll have to read through that PDF , this sounds pretty neat! Wingtips remind me of mother nature:




Thanks, Chris!! I was thinking, "Well, this could imspire someone!" so I dumped it in here. Not much thought was put into it.  ;D
-Sprues McDuck-

jcf

Yep, the birds were the inspiration.

jcf

Pfenninger concept from 1975:


Slides from Virginia Tech Powerpoint on their research:




Virginia Tech Powerpoint on the Truss Braced Wing (select slideshow at top of viewer window):
http://slideplayer.com/slide/5971786/

A History of the Truss Braced Wing:
http://awin.aviationweek.com/Portals/aweek/media/truss/truss.html

Boeing and Nasa have been working together on research for years, Boeing SUGAR:


https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20160007043.pdf

TheChronicOne

This stuff is sooooo cool, man, thanks!!!!! Very inspirational, as well. This 1975 one I really like.
-Sprues McDuck-

jcf