avatar_Tophe

BD-5 family drawings

Started by Tophe, June 05, 2019, 08:57:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Tophe

Dear Weaver,
I thank you for this idea that I would note have thought of, great!:


And this makes me think of the opposite direction: an even smaller BD-5, like a control challenge... For the code BD-5S could have been Small but was already Sailplane, BD-5T could have been Tiny but was already Turbo, so BD-5L is Smallest...:
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

And the BD-5L-3 was like a flying catalogue of versions, while the L-2 was a tailless fast one (even more difficult to control):

(thanks again, Weaver)
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

PR19_Kit

I can see there being a run on the LS kit of the BD5 at this rate.  ;D
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Tophe

Sorry this is not yet the end... :-\

I add a simple asymmetric derivative like a Bv-141:


With a whole family of its own...:
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Thanks to imagine they would actually fly!
(even if this is without pilot inside, to endanger no life...) ;D
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

#50
I agree with our friend Ericr logic: each airplane (or microplane) family must have seaplane versions (flying boat or/and floatplane):
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Quote from: Tophe on June 12, 2019, 06:06:56 PM
I agree with our friend Ericr logic: each airplane (or microplane) family must have seaplane versions (flying boat or/and floatplane):
Not forgetting twin-hull and single-float versions, of course:

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

And maybe this one counts both as seaplane and (vertical) twin-boom (two longitudinal bodies holding the tail):
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

The biplane BD-5 had specific advantages: solidity, maneuverability... not speed.
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

ericr

Quote from: Tophe on June 12, 2019, 09:42:04 PM
And maybe this one counts both as seaplane and (vertical) twin-boom (two longitudinal bodies holding the tail):

these are all excellent ideas ! thanks a lot !


Tophe

Thanks for the approval of our "invented seaplanes" expert! ;D
(for visitors ignoring the magic of ericr's ones, see https://www.whatifmodellers.com/index.php?topic=40517.0 - 57 pages only... ;) )
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

ericr


Tophe

Thanks!

Now, more seriously, the BD-5+5 Mistel... whose layout is justified by a good technical reason: "attracting attention"...:

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

The XF-85 Goblin was also a very little plane, and this one is closed to the BD-5G:
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

There was a BD-5 with annular wing, unbuilt alas... :-\
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]