avatar_63cpe

Lockheed Viking AEW4

Started by 63cpe, March 05, 2020, 08:56:53 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

63cpe

Meanwhile the build off the Lockheed Viking AEW4 also started. Here some first pictures I'd like to share.

At first all in normal. Start is, as always with the cockpit:
IMG_20200305_083945016 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr

I decided to put in a pavla cockpit in as the airfix one is really poor in detail.
IMG_20200305_084027070 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr

After closing the fuselage halves a gap of 2 mm was left of the slightly too wide pavla cockpit (and my lack of checking)
IMG_20200305_090932772 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr

But, nothing to worry about as putty will close the gaps. But, oh what's happening...that tail is totally the wrong way!
IMG_20200305_124523038 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr

Ah, that's what's happening: the radar disc is going on top off the tail. Engines are from an ancient Matchbox A-10 (the grey plastic was getting yellow!) and are supposed to go on the leading edge of the wing.
IMG_20200305_131132042 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr

Hope you like it!

Cheers,
David aka 63cpe



PR19_Kit

Quote from: 63cpe on March 05, 2020, 08:56:53 AM

After closing the fuselage halves a gap of 2 mm was left of the slightly too wide pavla cockpit (and my lack of checking)


I've had that happen with Pavla cockpits I've used too.

I think their rulers need re-calibrating.................
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

jalles

Fantastic start! Is this going to be like smaller Antonov AN-71 with the engines above he wing?

Dizzyfugu

That's looking very good.  :thumbsup:

NARSES2

Quote from: PR19_Kit on March 05, 2020, 10:41:09 AM
Quote from: 63cpe on March 05, 2020, 08:56:53 AM

After closing the fuselage halves a gap of 2 mm was left of the slightly too wide pavla cockpit (and my lack of checking)


I've had that happen with Pavla cockpits I've used too.

I think their rulers need re-calibrating.................

I'd like to be associated with those comments. They look great, but do they fit ? Do they heck. I got a lot when I got back into the hobby as I though it was the thing to do. I still have most of them and I doubt if they will get used the fit of the ones I did try was that bad, non existent in fact.
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

PR19_Kit

Quote from: NARSES2 on March 06, 2020, 01:38:03 AM

I'd like to be associated with those comments. They look great, but do they fit ? Do they heck. I got a lot when I got back into the hobby as I though it was the thing to do. I still have most of them and I doubt if they will get used the fit of the ones I did try was that bad, non existent in fact.


I'm glad it's not just me.  :thumbsup:

Some of them are OK, others need vast amounts of the fuselage moulding filed or Dremeled away before they fit. Don't they ever test fit them?  :banghead:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

63cpe

I Use the pavla cockpits often and most are ok-ish. They always need trimming...some more than other though...

I forgot I was too lazy to check the fit anyway. I should have known better. Anyway, it's fixed now and putty number 2 is curing. Time for an update:

After the first putty and sanding this is the result:
IMG_20200306_120635543 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr

IMG_20200306_120642228 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr

The rudder needed a wider chord, so a 747 stabilo was cut to fit.
IMG_20200306_120700396 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr

The MAD boom is still operable:

IMG_20200306_120706025 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr

IMG_20200306_120714192 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr

IMG_20200306_120734078 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr

Had to put the canopy on and puttied the seams again:
IMG_20200306_120801221 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr

IMG_20200306_120812089 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr

It definetly looks like a mini Madcap (An-71/74):
IMG_20200306_120844529 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr

Cheers,
David aka 63cpe

NARSES2

I can see the Madcap likeness, but I can also see a Beriev influence in there.
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

McColm


63cpe

Thanks gentlemen!

David aka 63cpe

AndrewF

Excellent! Especially the fin support for the radome.

Captain Canada

That is so cool ! After seeing the first pics with the engines on the table under the machine I had to do a few scroll up/ down moves lol. Love it !
CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

63cpe

Update time!

Wings are curing an the engines ar on the wings...
IMG_20200315_102143862 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr
IMG_20200315_102035944 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr
IMG_20200315_102021173 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr
IMG_20200315_102005540 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr
IMG_20200315_101942163 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr
IMG_20200315_101927627 by Buddy Holly, on Flickr

PSR continues

Cheers,
David aka 63cpe

PR19_Kit

Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

McColm

That's given me an idea of what to do with the Airfix Bristol Superfreighter  :thumbsup: