Main Menu
avatar_NARSES2

Finished Builds

Started by NARSES2, June 17, 2020, 12:40:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

NARSES2

Self explanatory, but the place for your finished builds. I'll unlock it when the GB starts

Chris
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

NARSES2

Unlocked just in case, after all Dizzy's had at least 12 hours  :angel:

NO, seriously here's the place for your builds lads, best of luck

Chris
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Dizzyfugu

So, here's the first submission: a 1:72 model (kitbashing) of the RWD-24, aircraft "01(-24), 1st prototype"; Siły Powietrzne (Polish Air Force), during service trials, Okęcie aerodrome (Warsaw), early 1937








More about it here: https://www.whatifmodellers.com/index.php?topic=48075.msg889177#msg889177


PR19_Kit

The real first EVER Meteor PR19, now revealed to the public eye.







Build thread is here :- https://www.whatifmodellers.com/index.php?topic=48088.0

and backstory is here :- https://www.whatifmodellers.com/index.php?topic=48146.new#new
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

AeroplaneDriver

Folland/Hawker Siddley Fo.155 "Red Wasp" long range stand-off missile prototype No.3, Woomera Test Range, February 1964. 












Build and backstory here. https://www.whatifmodellers.com/index.php?topic=48087.0
So I got that going for me...which is nice....


sandiego89

Prototype XB-58 on roll-out from the Convair factory, Fort Worth, Texas, 1956

Lindburg 1/64 Scale. 

by Sandiego89







build thread
https://www.whatifmodellers.com/index.php?topic=48092.15

Dave "Sandiego89"
Chesapeake, Virginia, USA

Tophe

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

TomZ

#11
Luftwaffe 1946 Fighter Competition



At the beginning of 1945 the RLM (Reichsluftfahrt Ministerium) invited aircraft manufacturers for three fighter competitions to provide new fighters for the Luftwaffe. The aim was to reduce the number of operational types and achieve a significant step forward in fighter capabilities over the types then service. The Luftwaffe used a mix of FW-190, Ta-152, Me-109, Me-262, He-162 and Me-163 types. The piston engined fighters were more and more outclassed by the newer allied fighters and the jet aircraft were clearly the first-generation jets with all associated teething problems.





Edit: Post cut down in this, the finished entries section.

More (a lot  ;D) pics here:
https://www.whatifmodellers.com/index.php?topic=48107.msg894010#msg894010


TomZ

Reality is an illusion caused by an alcohol deficiency

PR19_Kit

Erm, I'm not sure how we can manage this.

You're only meant to have three pics in this section, plus a link to the actual build, but.................

You've got 21 models there, so in theory you could have posted 63 pics, 66 if you count the hangar itself as a 'prototype'.  :o :o  ;D ;D ;D
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

TomZ

#13
Quote from: PR19_Kit on August 15, 2020, 11:30:26 AM
Erm, I'm not sure how we can manage this.

You're only meant to have three pics in this section, plus a link to the actual build, but.................

You've got 21 models there, so in theory you could have posted 63 pics, 66 if you count the hangar itself as a 'prototype'.  :o :o  ;D ;D ;D

Oops, sorry. Didn't know about the 3 pics rule.
I cut it down to three pics here.

TomZ

Reality is an illusion caused by an alcohol deficiency

NARSES2

Quote from: TomZ on August 15, 2020, 11:42:41 AM

Oops, sorry. Didn't know about the 3 pics rule.
I cut it down to three pics here.

TomZ

No problems Tom it's more an "understanding" than a "rule"  ;D
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.