Main Menu
avatar_NARSES2

Prototypes G.B. General Discussion

Started by NARSES2, June 17, 2020, 12:46:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

zenrat

Quote from: zenrat on June 17, 2020, 04:11:49 AM
Handley Page Victor SP.

;D



I had an epiphany last night while cleaning my teeth and came up with a reason why I will be doing what I will be doing (other then aesthetics).  I'll just say NB-36H...


Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

PR19_Kit

Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

kitnut617

Quote from: zenrat on June 19, 2020, 03:41:59 AM

I had an epiphany last night while cleaning my teeth and came up with a reason why I will be doing what I will be doing (other then aesthetics).  I'll just say NB-36H...

In 1/72 ???    On Shapeways, Click2Detail has a conversion to do that.
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

zenrat

Quote from: kitnut617 on June 19, 2020, 05:50:30 AM
Quote from: zenrat on June 19, 2020, 03:41:59 AM

I had an epiphany last night while cleaning my teeth and came up with a reason why I will be doing what I will be doing (other then aesthetics).  I'll just say NB-36H...

In 1/72 ???    On Shapeways, Click2Detail has a conversion to do that.

For a Victor?
:unsure:

No,  I know what you meant.  Thanks.   :thumbsup:
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

Scotaidh

Well, pooh.  :(  I was planning to do an English Electric P6,. but Dizzy has already beaten me to it.  When I googled "English Electric P6 aircraft" all I see is pictures of his creation - and a whole lotta Lightnings, because apparently Google thinks their users don't know what they want.   :banghead:

To be fair, other search engines do the same thing ...  :banghead: :banghead:

I may just go ahead with it anyway - I'm sure I'll have different donor kits, and he built his as an 'in service' aircraft, not a prototype.
Thistle dew, Pig - thistle dew!

Where am I going?  And why am I in a handbasket?

It's dark in the dark when it's dark. Ancient Ogre Proverb

"All right, boyz - the plan iz 'Win.'  And if ya lose, it's yer own fault 'coz ya didn't follow the plan."

Tophe

Maybe I could draw a XP-85 Parasite Mustang Jet fighter, as a mix between P-51 and XF-85. If I colour it in overall bright orange, does that count as USAAF prototype?
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

jcf

Quote from: Tophe on June 20, 2020, 10:56:04 AM
Maybe I could draw a XP-85 Parasite Mustang Jet fighter, as a mix between P-51 and XF-85. If I colour it in overall bright orange, does that count as USAAF prototype?

:thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Tophe

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Weaver

Quote from: Snowtrooper on June 18, 2020, 09:43:33 AM
Quote from: tigercat on June 17, 2020, 04:24:56 AM
Aren't some of the Matchbox kits based on the prototypes rather than the operational aircraft . The A10 springs to mind
Correct (M61 instead of BRRRRRT on the nose, stabilizers, paint schemes). Also Mbox Alpha Jet is based on the mock-up (even German A version has the blunt E nose), F-14 is a cross between the prototypes and earliest production examples (notably it is the only Tomcat kit with the early style wing glove box).

Other prototypes of later series produced machines out of the box are Airfix/Hasegawa/Frog Saab Viggen (the readily apparent feature is the distinctive lack of the area-ruled "hump" that even the Matchbox kit had), Hasegawa's earliest F-15 (with straight wingtips and even prototype markings!) and whatever the MiG-23 is pretending to be, Revell's original F-16 (YF-16), JAS Gripen (mockup with wtfhuge wing fold panel lines never even found on any of the prototypes or even the actual mockup and MASSIVE rivets), JF90/EFA Eurofighter (again a mockup, shape differences aside it has wingtips extending through the ECM pods and missing two weapon pylons and cannon port), and MiG-29. There's probably many more...

Wasn't there an early F-16 kit (Revell? Monogram?) That had the short nose and small tail fins? Seem to remember it came in a prototype scheme and had a removable engine on a trolley.
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

Weaver

Quote from: zenrat on June 19, 2020, 03:41:59 AM
Quote from: zenrat on June 17, 2020, 04:11:49 AM
Handley Page Victor SP.

;D



I had an epiphany last night while cleaning my teeth and came up with a reason why I will be doing what I will be doing (other then aesthetics).  I'll just say NB-36H...

Does that mean you have six million teeth flying in close formation?
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

Weaver

Quote from: Scotaidh on June 20, 2020, 09:03:28 AM
Well, pooh.  :(  I was planning to do an English Electric P6,. but Dizzy has already beaten me to it.  When I googled "English Electric P6 aircraft" all I see is pictures of his creation - and a whole lotta Lightnings, because apparently Google thinks their users don't know what they want.   :banghead:

To be fair, other search engines do the same thing ...  :banghead: :banghead:

I may just go ahead with it anyway - I'm sure I'll have different donor kits, and he built his as an 'in service' aircraft, not a prototype.

It's not looking for the picture, it's looking for the words close to it. Hard to find any discussion of the P6 without the Lightning being mentioned somewhere very close by.
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

zenrat

Quote from: Weaver on June 20, 2020, 08:57:21 PM
Quote from: Snowtrooper on June 18, 2020, 09:43:33 AM
Quote from: tigercat on June 17, 2020, 04:24:56 AM
Aren't some of the Matchbox kits based on the prototypes rather than the operational aircraft . The A10 springs to mind
Correct (M61 instead of BRRRRRT on the nose, stabilizers, paint schemes). Also Mbox Alpha Jet is based on the mock-up (even German A version has the blunt E nose), F-14 is a cross between the prototypes and earliest production examples (notably it is the only Tomcat kit with the early style wing glove box).

Other prototypes of later series produced machines out of the box are Airfix/Hasegawa/Frog Saab Viggen (the readily apparent feature is the distinctive lack of the area-ruled "hump" that even the Matchbox kit had), Hasegawa's earliest F-15 (with straight wingtips and even prototype markings!) and whatever the MiG-23 is pretending to be, Revell's original F-16 (YF-16), JAS Gripen (mockup with wtfhuge wing fold panel lines never even found on any of the prototypes or even the actual mockup and MASSIVE rivets), JF90/EFA Eurofighter (again a mockup, shape differences aside it has wingtips extending through the ECM pods and missing two weapon pylons and cannon port), and MiG-29. There's probably many more...

Wasn't there an early F-16 kit (Revell? Monogram?) That had the short nose and small tail fins? Seem to remember it came in a prototype scheme and had a removable engine on a trolley.

The first Hasegawa 1/72 F-16s came in the prototype scheme and had, I think, the  corresponding parts.  No removable engine though.
General Dynamics F-16A Blue B21 by Fred Maillardet, on Flickr

The first Airfix Tornado came in the red and white MRCA scheme.  I don't know enough about the aircraft though to say if the model represented a prototype.
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

McColm

What about aircraft that have appeared in films such as the " SkyFleet S570" prototype which was a Boeing 747 with a pair of B-52 engines under each wing?

Dizzyfugu

Quote from: zenrat on June 20, 2020, 09:54:36 PM
The first Airfix Tornado came in the red and white MRCA scheme.  I don't know enough about the aircraft though to say if the model represented a prototype.

Yes, it does. IIRC it should be the 3rd prototype (red and white livery, mixed national markings, built in Germany; there was also a prototype built in Italy with the same scheme, but it carried tri-national roundels and a diffrerent fin flash). Other Tornado prototype carried different liveries, though, and there were a lot of them. Lots of whiffing potential here...  ;)

Dizzyfugu

BTW, my second "mystery" build. Can materialized - I was able to procure a suitable donor kit for ingredients. I'll just reveal that it will be a kitbashing, and that it involves stealth.  :mellow: