RAF Boeing B-29 1944 /1945

Started by Knightflyer, February 20, 2021, 03:22:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

comrade harps

Quote from: Knightflyer on February 20, 2021, 07:20:47 AM
A quick first draft ....excuse the basic skills!  ;D



I do like that, though  :wub:
Whatever.

Knightflyer

#16
Good Morning Gents  ;D

Thanks for all the suggestions, and I agree with the logic of the night undersides with either grey, white or grey/green. I suppose my weak argument is that because that what WAS used on the heavy bombers (and yes the canberras and mosquitos) that is precisely why I want to go with a different scheme. Anyway the fuselage is not closed up yet or the wings attached to it, so still some thinking time to go!  ;D

Anyway, second draft drawing, colours the right way up, and a slightly more realistic roundel!



and a rough approximation of the Cranberry Scheme



Oh to be whiffing again :-(

chrisonord

I quite like  the second one,  very striking  colour scheme.  The one above  is a very similar version of what I  have painted my Super freighter,  which  is in Honduras navy  service.  :thumbsup:
Chris
The dogs philosophy on life.
If you cant eat it hump it or fight it,
Pee on it and walk away!!

Pellson

#18
Quote from: Knightflyer on February 21, 2021, 12:42:31 AM
..and a rough approximation of the Cranberry Scheme



I like that. In general, I feel big birds should have disruptive schemes - just because they seldom do. Look at the B-52, for instance. It was way cooler in the old SAC camo than is is now, being grey and dull.

But that's just me, and if it is of any comfort, I rarely even myself take my own advice..  ;D
Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!

Knightflyer

Well some progress

I have gone from this



to this



I'm thinking the camouflage on this quite nicely leads into latter use by the Canberra and the V-Bombers. I'm looking forward to putting roundels on it  ;D
Oh to be whiffing again :-(

NARSES2

Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

ChernayaAkula

Cheers,
Moritz


Must, then, my projects bend to the iron yoke of a mechanical system? Is my soaring spirit to be chained down to the snail's pace of matter?

Knightflyer

Another weekend and a little more progress, still a bit drafty* (draughty) for the crew though!  ;D
*whoops, I think I've been Americanized!




Oh to be whiffing again :-(

PR19_Kit

That's looking very convincing.  :thumbsup:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

NARSES2

Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Knightflyer

Well this project actually got finished last November - but as I was in just starting (I didn't realise it at the time) what was a four-month doldrums period of modelling and life in general I'm only just getting around to posting.

VG925 / WS-B 9 Squadron September 1945

The back story is not fully developed, but follows a failed D-Day, a stalled Eastern Front and a resurgent Luftwaffe. More accurate V-Weapons target bomber airfields (fighters can be dispersed more easily) in Southern and Eastern England making then untenable. Therefore Scottish based RAF and USAAF B-29s (Washington's to the British) continue to carry the fight to Germany.

Following the dropping of an atom bomb by the USAAF on Berlin on the 10th August 1945, a second bomb is dropped on Munich by the RAF* ('Bertie' WS-B of No. 9 Squadron) a week later. The broadcasted warnings of a third bomb (to be dropped by the USAAF again) caused the final collapse of the Nazi Regime towards the the end of August 1945

The pictures show 'Bertie' in it's immediate end-of-hostilities markings with mission markings showing it's eight missions (seven ordinary bombing runs and the culminating atom bomb mission)

*the decision to allow RAF to drop the second bomb was a political one, allowing the UK to share some of the responsibility and some of the post-war burden










Oh to be whiffing again :-(

PR19_Kit

So glad to see it finally finished, and it looks great.  :thumbsup:

I like the backstory too, holes or not.  ;D
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Wardukw

Yup i like that ..i had the Monogram 48th one..that dive bombed me in the head one night  :lol:
Ill admit tho even tho this is much smaller it looks far better than mine ..many times better  :thumbsup:
If it aint broke ,,fix it until it is .
Over kill is often very understated .
I know the voices in my head ain't real but they do come up with some great ideas.
Theres few of lifes problems that can't be solved with the proper application of a high explosive projectile .

NARSES2

That's come out well, particularly like the colour scheme  :thumbsup:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.