avatar_Tophe

Canberstang ?

Started by Tophe, June 27, 2022, 11:36:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Tophe

I had another idea: make the slanting view drawing of the Camberra, then create a mix replacing the Camberra big fuselage by a little Mustang fuselage (as flying wing?), either with nose engine+propeller or else free nose (or photographic nose) the lateral jets being enough. Or the same with bigger Mustang of higher scale (like 1/48th on 1/72nd).
Soon, last week will be July.
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Joe C-P

Why not two Mustangs, with a bridge wing between?
In want of hobby space!  The kitchen table is never stable.  Still managing to get some building done.

Tophe

Quote from: JoeP on June 30, 2022, 08:49:35 AM
Why not two Mustangs, with a bridge wing between?
Good idea, © JoeP ® !
In 2 versions of Twin-Camberstang: 2 external jets or 3 jets with a central one, at the middle of the bridge. Yes, thanks!
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

This morning, I have prepared the Wikipedia 3v source for my vector drawing of Canberra slanting view (with the same angles and scale as my old drawings of Mustangs): the span of the P-51/Canberra is 11.0m/19.51m=56.38%.
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

The slanting view of the Canberra is now done also: <_<
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Now they have been mixed into one, as was the goal.
The two first ones are tailless but I consider a T-tail maybe, before the Twin(s), symmetric or not: ;)

= link http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/Canberra-persp-d.jpg
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

PR19_Kit

Now that's what I call a wing!  :thumbsup:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Tophe

Thanks Kit, I prepare better for you but I don't remember if this is in this topic or the other of mine about Canberra, I will check.

Quote from: Tophe on July 01, 2022, 04:38:23 AM
I consider a T-tail maybe
Here are them: <_<

= link http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/Canberra-persp-e.jpg
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

There are many combinations, I will not illustrate them all, that would be boring... ;)

= link http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/Canberra-persp-j.jpg
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Joe C-P

Quote from: Tophe on July 01, 2022, 08:09:58 AM
There are many combinations, I will not illustrate them all, that would be boring... ;)

= link http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/Canberra-persp-j.jpg

:wub:  Now that's quite the result.

JoeP
In want of hobby space!  The kitchen table is never stable.  Still managing to get some building done.

zenrat

Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

Tophe

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Using two P-51 Mustang fuselages produced a Canberstang flying wing with twin pods ;
Using instead one P-82 Twin-Mustang produces now a Canberstang twin fuselage with simplicity: ;)

= link http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/Canberra-persp-t.jpg
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Next steps to draw (the following days):
- drawing file 21, export file u,  model Mk.82j: 2 noses without propeller
- drawing file 22, export file v, model Mk.82a: 1 nose without propeller asymmetric + 1 extra tailplane external asymmetric
- drawing file 23, export file w, model Mk.82s: single fuselage (half P-82), 2 external tailplanes
- drawing file 24, export file x, model Mk.82t: single P-82 fuselage + T-tailplane
I could draw them today but no urgency I think, as the end of this GB is in late September. <_<
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]