avatar_TomZ

Vickers Valiant EC Mk-3

Started by TomZ, October 03, 2022, 10:33:29 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

TomZ

Vickers Valiant EC Mk-3



When the Vickers Valiant entered service in 1951 it was soon realized that unescorted bombers were very vulnerable to enemy fighters. Following the same line of thinking as the USA with the projects FICON, Tom-Tom and the F-85 Goblin, the RAF sought to equip the bombers with their own escorts, carried with them into enemy territory and released when attacked.



Where the US trials were centred around the massive Convair B-36 bomber, the Vickers Valiant was light and therefore limited in its capacity. The then current RAD fighters like the Meteor were too heavy to be carried by a Valiant and the RAF asked the UK Aeronautical industry to come up with a light weight fighter to fulfil this role.



The De Haviland factory offered a development of their DH-108 aircraft, fitted with two canon and an improved engine. Also minor changes were made to improve stability and flying characteristics. This option had the advantage of being based on an existing aircraft so it could be made available a lot quicker than the new designs offered by Supermarine and Hawker.



So in 1953 the first Valiant EC Mk 3 (EC for Escort Carrier) took to the air carrying a DH-108 F Mk-2 fighter on its back. The first aircraft was lost in 1954 when the DH-108 hit the tail of the Valiant and exploded after release. This lead to a revised operating procedure where the DH-108 was release with its engine at full throttle and the pilot pulling up sharply upon release.



Prolonged trials were held with the 3 EC Mk-3 Valiants but in 1955 the programme was ended and no production order followed. The concept was deemed as too risky for the fighter pilots as there was no possibility of retrieval after release and also the releasing procedure remained risky with various accidents and near accident occurring.


Models: Airfix 1/72 Valiant & MikroMir DH-108

TomZ
Reality is an illusion caused by an alcohol deficiency

Wardukw

 :lol: that's brilliant Tom...that's one way to protect the Valiant  :thumbsup:
If it aint broke ,,fix it until it is .
Over kill is often very understated .
I know the voices in my head ain't real but they do come up with some great ideas.
Theres few of lifes problems that can't be solved with the proper application of a high explosive projectile .

PR19_Kit

That's AWESOME Tom!   :thumbsup:

And it must be a hefty size too.  :o
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Rheged

Unexpected, but most imaginative!  Well done.
"If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you....."
It  means that you read  the instruction sheet

Glenn Gilbertson


Pellson

Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!

Captain Canada

Wow ! That one looks fun ! Great idea for sure, and it looks so right. I should say they look so right. Nice work !
CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

McColm


zenrat

Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

NARSES2

Excellent build Tom  :bow:

I built the Planet DH 108 years ago and have always liked the aircraft, didn't realise Micro-Mir did one. Thankyou  :thumbsup:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Tophe

Great combo! :wub:
And the parasite fighter is more easy to see upon the back than under the belly but... coming back to be attached may be uneasy with the fin of the mother plane... ;)
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

TomZ

Quote from: Tophe on October 04, 2022, 06:54:13 AMGreat combo! :wub:
And the parasite fighter is more easy to see upon the back than under the belly but... coming back to be attached may be uneasy with the fin of the mother plane... ;)

Fully agree. That's why I mounted it on top. Looks far nicer  ;D  ;D  ;D
And yes, coming back is impossible this way. But, as the back story says, that is why the experiment was stopped........

TomZ
Reality is an illusion caused by an alcohol deficiency


Nick

That is wonderful. It looks very realistic.

I can just see one of those Valiants in Raspberry Ripple surviving into the 1970s and launching all sorts of odd British aircraft testbeds.

comrade harps

Looks great.

Funny with all these parasite fighters how the successful retrieval of the fighter pilots always seemed to be a low priority.
Whatever.