avatar_killnoizer

P40 Warhawk single Jet

Started by killnoizer, January 14, 2023, 12:21:43 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

killnoizer

Maybe someone like to see how i use different parts to build the jet version of the Warhawk .
I use a Tank or a bomb of a cheap Mig 31 kit and a very fine Special Hobby P40 .
Both kits are in 1:72 measure ! 

Cutting the tank in pieces, nice they make VERY DEEP lines for the cut in it and glueing together, make some light sanding for the exhaust ready before !
You cannot view this attachment.
Check out the fit into the fuselage and cut them out carefully .   The picture shows the position of the jet engine output in the downside , nearly realistic .
You cannot view this attachment.

You cannot view this attachment.
It's a Land Rover, NOT a Jeep . Like a Jeep, but for gentlemen.

https://www.spacejunks.com/

Flyer

"I'm a precisional instrument of speed and aromatics." - Tow Mater.

"People say nothing is impossible, but I do nothing all day." - A. A. Milne.

mexchiwa

With that big chin radiator the P-40 has the nose for a jet

killnoizer

Quote from: mexchiwa on January 14, 2023, 01:08:09 AMWith that big chin radiator the P-40 has the nose for a jet


That is what I think , yes . Converting props into jets is my thing at the moment . I like the old style 30's  Warhawk design converted into jet power .

SkyCaptain would have loved it I think ...
It's a Land Rover, NOT a Jeep . Like a Jeep, but for gentlemen.

https://www.spacejunks.com/

SPINNERS

Very interesting! Any thoughts on making it with a nose wheel? The radiator (intake) looks wide enough for a bifurbcated duct.

killnoizer

This is the very first come together of the three main parts after cutting the bottom out. Looks very well for me . 

The radius of the front and the tank are nearly identic !    I have searched in 10+ kits for the right combination


You cannot view this attachment.
It's a Land Rover, NOT a Jeep . Like a Jeep, but for gentlemen.

https://www.spacejunks.com/

Gondor

Quote from: SPINNERS on January 14, 2023, 02:08:15 AMVery interesting! Any thoughts on making it with a nose wheel? The radiator (intake) looks wide enough for a bifurbcated duct.

Very difficult considering where the main undercarriage is located at the front of the wing. A lot of the first jets were tail draggers anyway.

Gondor
My Ability to Imagine is only exceeded by my Imagined Abilities

Gondor's Modelling Rule Number Three: Everything will fit perfectly untill you apply glue...

I know it's in a book I have around here somewhere....

SPINNERS

Quote from: Gondor on January 14, 2023, 02:45:41 AM
Quote from: SPINNERS on January 14, 2023, 02:08:15 AMVery interesting! Any thoughts on making it with a nose wheel? The radiator (intake) looks wide enough for a bifurbcated duct.

Very difficult considering where the main undercarriage is located at the front of the wing. A lot of the first jets were tail draggers anyway.

Gondor

Yes, I know. It's got me wondering if they used 'normal' tyres on the tailwheel or solid tyres of some sort.

Old Wombat

I know some used steel wheels, & some had the exhaust vent above & behind the tail wheel but there are probably other options, like splitting the exhaust or going twin-engined.
Has a life outside of What-If & wishes it would stop interfering!

"The purpose of all War is Peace" - St. Augustine

veritas ad mortus veritas est

SPINNERS

The Yak-15 wiki states this...

The conventional landing gear was also unmodified other than the tailwheel which now used several steel leaf springs as shock absorbers. The Yak-Jumo carried a total of 590 kilograms (1,300 lb) of fuel. Taxi tests began in October 1945, but the heatshield proved to be too short and the heat from the engine exhaust melted the duralumin skin of the rear fuselage as well as the rubber tire of the tailwheel. Modifications to rectify the problems took until late December. By this time a second prototype had been completed with a solid steel tailwheel and an enlarged tailplane.

So, a solid rubber tailwheel at first (hence the leaf springs) and then a predictable switch to a steel tailwheel.

Tophe

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

killnoizer

#11
Haha , at this project I do not care about the landing gear ...  but planing one of the next coming fighters with extended wheels for a diorama and modern front wheel , right ! 

From the last made 190 twin jet I will do some more variants , with different arrangements for the engines and planes . 

Thank you very much for support  :thumbsup:

You cannot view this attachment.


 
It's a Land Rover, NOT a Jeep . Like a Jeep, but for gentlemen.

https://www.spacejunks.com/

PR19_Kit

That fits VERY nicely, oh yes!  :thumbsup:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

NARSES2

Fascinating project and a very neat build  :thumbsup:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

mexchiwa

Are you going to change the armament arrangement at all?  All that new space in the nose (though problems with gun gas ingestion)