avatar_AeroplaneDriver

USAF Avro F-95 “Can-nuke” Completed

Started by AeroplaneDriver, February 05, 2023, 01:12:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

sandiego89

Dave "Sandiego89"
Chesapeake, Virginia, USA

NARSES2

Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

AeroplaneDriver

#77


The Avro CF-100 took a winding path to USAF service.  As with many allied foreign designs the USAF evaluated the aircraft, albeit for a ground attack role, where its range and payload were inferior to the competing British Canberra. 

Unfortunately, in 1954 the flutter issues that had plagued the early F-89s resurfaced, and after experiments to mitigate the issue it was determined an insurmountable design problem would made the aircraft prone to elevator flutter in certain flight regimes.  Performance envelope restrictions were placed on the Scorpion which severely limited its utility as an interceptor.

With the F-101 and F-102 suffering development delays and still several years from squadron service and Soviet air and nuclear power growing by the day this gap was seen as unacceptable.  A review of possible allied stopgap interceptors was launched.  While some in the USAF lobbied for the British Javelin, the US had already evaluated the CF-100 and found it to be a good platform, just unsuited to the ground attack requirement of the time.  A fresh look at its interceptor capabilities led to its selection in August 1954.  An order for 192 aircraft was placed that month, with US specific modifications including the fitting of 4x 20mm cannon in place of the 8x .50cal machine guns, US ejection seats, and the ability to carry the new Raytheon radar guided GAR-7 Pandora long range nuclear air-to-air missile. 

Renamed the F-95A Grizzly, the CF-100 entered USAF service in Autumn 1955.  Though planned as a short-term stop-gap interceptor, the Grizzly proved a capable aircraft that was popular with both crews and maintainers, and saw its service extended twice, finally leaving service with Air National Guard units in early 1965.  Despite its official "Grizzly" name, the F-95's Canadian heritage and frequent carriage of the Pandora missile led to it unofficially being called the "Can-nuke" by those who flew and maintained it. 

This model depicts a USAF F-95A of the 29th Fighter Interceptor Squadron based at Malmstrom AFB in Montana where it served from November 1957 until the squadron received F-101 Voodoos in 1961.  It carries two wingtip mounted GAR-7 Pandora missiles.  This aircraft was the only one to launch a live Pandora missile and is now displayed at the National Atomic Testing Museum in Las Vegas, Nevada. 

About Pandora:

The GAR-7 Pandora missile was developed to meet a requirement for a guided nuclear air-to-air missile to counter the threat of massed Soviet bomber squadrons.  The missile was built by Raytheon and developed from that company's Sparrow radar-guided missile.  The Pandora used an airframe that was basically a scaled-up version of the Sparrow though it featured clipped mid-body guidance fins.  It carried a 1.1kt warhead, placing it between the sub-kiloton GAR-5/6 Nuclear Falcon missiles and the 1.5 kt AIR-2 Genie unguided rocket.  Its larger size gave it a range of 11 miles compared to 6 miles for the other nuclear air-to-air weapons.  The mission profile called for the illuminating aircraft to launch at a 10-mile range and reduce speed to maintain distance from the target.  The missile was guided to a two-mile range, at which point it calculated an intercept path that it flew in unguided mode while the launch aircraft turned away from the target and imminent blast.  The missile had a radar proximity fuse and had a lethal blast radius estimated around 250-300 meters.

Only one live firing of a Pandora was carried out, as part of Operation Plumbob John II in October 1959 when the aircraft depicted here launched a Pandora at an altitude of 20,000 feet over the Yuca Flats Test Site in Nevada. 










So I got that going for me...which is nice....

Old Wombat

Build is excellent. :thumbsup:  :thumbsup:

Story is perfect! :thumbsup:  :thumbsup:
Has a life outside of What-If & wishes it would stop interfering!

"The purpose of all War is Peace" - St. Augustine

veritas ad mortus veritas est

kitbasher

What If? & Secret Project SIG member.
On the go: Beaumaris/Battle/Bronco/Barracuda/Flatning/Hellcat IV/Hunter PR11/Hurricane IIb/Ice Cream Tank/JP T4/Jumo MiG-15/P1103 (early)/P1154-ish/Phantom FG1/I-153/Sea Hawk T7/Spitfire XII/Spitfire Tr18/Twin Otter/FrankenCOIN/Frankenfighter

Wardukw

Now this wonderful build is done I am paying extremely attention to the pain work...ive got to do a similar job on my 58 and I want that to look half as good as this build 😀.
If it aint broke ,,fix it until it is .
Over kill is often very understated .
I know the voices in my head ain't real but they do come up with some great ideas.
Theres few of lifes problems that can't be solved with the proper application of a high explosive projectile .

NARSES2

Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

PR19_Kit

Quote from: Old Wombat on March 26, 2023, 09:55:41 PMBuild is excellent. :thumbsup:  :thumbsup:

Story is perfect! :thumbsup:  :thumbsup:


I can't improve on Womby's evaluation.  :thumbsup:  :thumbsup:

The colour scheme is perfect for the period.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit


zenrat

Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

jcf

:thumbsup: :thumbsup:

The warhead of the GAR-11/AIM-26 Nuclear Falcon was designed to generate an intense burst of
neutrons when detonated in order to interfere with the operation of the nuclear warheads in the
of the attacking bombers, the intent being that even if some of the bombers weren't downed by
the blast, the neutron burst could still pull their teeth. Evidently the publicly quoted yield of .25
KT for the W54 is a bit of obfuscation with the actual yield being around 1.1 KT.

The Rat

Quote from: AeroplaneDriver on March 26, 2023, 05:57:49 PMDespite its official "Grizzly" name, the F-95's Canadian heritage and frequent carriage of the Pandora missile led to it unofficially being called the "Can-nuke" by those who flew and maintained it. 

Now that bit, that bit right there, seals the back story for me, I love little details like that! And the model is beautiful!  :wub:  :thumbsup:  :bow:  :drink:
"My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought, cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives." Hedley Lamarr, Blazing Saddles

Life is too short to worry about perfection

Youtube: https://tinyurl.com/46dpfdpr

AeroplaneDriver

Thanks for all the kind comments everyone. A surprisingly pleasant build given my prior Hobbycraft experiences. 
So I got that going for me...which is nice....

Wardukw

It's well deserved Nick 😃.. it's a very cool build 😎 👍
If it aint broke ,,fix it until it is .
Over kill is often very understated .
I know the voices in my head ain't real but they do come up with some great ideas.
Theres few of lifes problems that can't be solved with the proper application of a high explosive projectile .

Mossie

Shiny. :mellow: I do like that combination of red with the NMF. :wub:  :wub:  :wub:
I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.