avatar_seadude

1/350 scale CVN-90 USS United States Stealth Aircraft Carrier

Started by seadude, May 23, 2023, 06:38:45 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

seadude

I've been thinking of changing the armaments on my carrier. Mostly the CIWS and anti-ship/anti-air missile systems.
The VLS will still stay on the carrier. But since I envisage my carrier as being like a Flight II Ford class in the 2045/2050 or so timeframe, I don't think Phalanx CIWS will be that effective or needed anymore. Since I just got done building a CIWS platform on the amidships port and starboard sides, I actually have two extra LANTIRN targeting pods that I can cut down to size and make two more laser defense turrets out of them to put in those locations. This increases my original amount of laser defense turrets from 4 to 6.
I may not add any regular NULKA decoy launchers or RAM missile launchers on the carrier. I did some searching and learned Lockheed was developing what was called an Extensible Launching System to it's Mk.41 VLS.
https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/rms/documents/naval-launchers-and-munitions/VLS_Host_ExLS_Launcher_Product_Card_8.5x11_042419.pdf
Apparently, just one VLS cell can hold 4 Nulka decoys or 4-6 RAM missiles. So............why bother having regular above deck RAM or Nulka launchers when instead all the rounds can be quad-packed in a VLS cell below decks to save space?
So, my carrier will have plenty of VLS at the bow port & starboard weapon sponsons and the aft port & starboard weapon sponsons for ESSM anti-air/anti-ship defense missiles, Nulka decoy rounds, and RAM anti-air/anti-ship defense missiles.


Modeling isn't just about how good the gluing or painting, etc. looks. It's also about how creative and imaginative you can be with a subject.
My modeling philosophy is: Don't build what everyone else has done. Build instead what nobody has seen or done before.

seadude

Starboard side CIWS platform has been built and added.

















Modeling isn't just about how good the gluing or painting, etc. looks. It's also about how creative and imaginative you can be with a subject.
My modeling philosophy is: Don't build what everyone else has done. Build instead what nobody has seen or done before.

seadude

A few small updates.
So, when will I get started on painting this beast? Not sure yet.
Might not be for another month or two as I still have a lot of aftermarket accessories to buy and more details to scratch build and be added.











Modeling isn't just about how good the gluing or painting, etc. looks. It's also about how creative and imaginative you can be with a subject.
My modeling philosophy is: Don't build what everyone else has done. Build instead what nobody has seen or done before.

seadude

And another small update.
Being stuck at home yesterday and today during blizzard conditions, and most likely being stuck at home the next several days due to extremely cold temps, is allowing me to get some much needed work done on this carrier since I didn't do much, if anything, on it during the holiday period last year in November and December.







Modeling isn't just about how good the gluing or painting, etc. looks. It's also about how creative and imaginative you can be with a subject.
My modeling philosophy is: Don't build what everyone else has done. Build instead what nobody has seen or done before.

Gondor

My Ability to Imagine is only exceeded by my Imagined Abilities

Gondor's Modelling Rule Number Three: Everything will fit perfectly untill you apply glue...

I know it's in a book I have around here somewhere....

seadude

Quote from: Gondor on January 13, 2024, 12:05:13 PMLove what your doing with this.  :thumbsup:

Gondor

Thanks. Appreciate it.  :thumbsup:
Anyway, just to let everyone know, my carrier model isn't going to be an exact copy of the Gerald Ford class carrier. The TAMIYA Enterprise model hull is completely different from that of the Gerald Ford class hull. Some things I can add or change that will make my model "similar" to what is on the GF class. But there will not be exact copies of anything for various reasons which includes, but is not limited to:
1. Do not have a 3D printer.
2. Not rich. So can't afford a lot of aftermarket accessories.
So anything I add or change mostly comes from using whatever spare model parts I have or scratch building stuff. Maybe it's almost better that way. Sometimes, I do my best thinking when scratch building. ;)  :thumbsup:
Modeling isn't just about how good the gluing or painting, etc. looks. It's also about how creative and imaginative you can be with a subject.
My modeling philosophy is: Don't build what everyone else has done. Build instead what nobody has seen or done before.

PR19_Kit

Looking at that stern-on view makes me wonder why it doesn't roll over!  :o
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

seadude

Quote from: PR19_Kit on January 13, 2024, 12:37:44 PMLooking at that stern-on view makes me wonder why it doesn't roll over!  :o

Getting seasick yet?  ;D  :wacko:  Pics below.






Modeling isn't just about how good the gluing or painting, etc. looks. It's also about how creative and imaginative you can be with a subject.
My modeling philosophy is: Don't build what everyone else has done. Build instead what nobody has seen or done before.

seadude

Modeling isn't just about how good the gluing or painting, etc. looks. It's also about how creative and imaginative you can be with a subject.
My modeling philosophy is: Don't build what everyone else has done. Build instead what nobody has seen or done before.

seadude

Modeling isn't just about how good the gluing or painting, etc. looks. It's also about how creative and imaginative you can be with a subject.
My modeling philosophy is: Don't build what everyone else has done. Build instead what nobody has seen or done before.

NARSES2

Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

seadude

I need help. :(
All U.S. carriers have decoy launchers on them to thwart anti-ship missiles.
These launchers would be the Mk.36 SBROC chaff/flare decoy launching system and/or the NULKA decoy launching system.
Links to both are here. Pics are below of each.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_36_SRBOC
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nulka
Now I've looked all over the pics of the Gerald Ford class carrier here: https://www.seaforces.org/usnships/cvn/CVN-78-USS-Gerald-R-Ford.htm
............and I can't find either of these systems anywhere around the circumference of the ship along the catwalks or on the weapon sponsons, etc.  :banghead:
I want to add these systems to my model, but I need to see the general locations of where they are on a real carrier.
Either the Ford class truly doesn't have either of these systems (Which would be totally foolish) or I am going blind and can't see them in the pics.
So if somebody has better eyesight, can you help spot them for me in the pics from that Seaforces link above? Thanks.




Modeling isn't just about how good the gluing or painting, etc. looks. It's also about how creative and imaginative you can be with a subject.
My modeling philosophy is: Don't build what everyone else has done. Build instead what nobody has seen or done before.

kerick

Not much to see at that scale anyway. I'm not a ship guy but sounds like something not big enough to worry about.
" Somewhere, between half true, and completely crazy, is a rainbow of nice colours "
Tophe the Wise

Old Wombat

Quote from: kerick on January 16, 2024, 04:47:23 PMNot much to see at that scale anyway. I'm not a ship guy but sounds like something not big enough to worry about.

They're big enough, in scale, that it would be unwise not to include them if you want a level of "realism" in your whif build.

On that point, however, I've done quite a bit of digging for you & the only active decoy system I can find that has been installed is Nixie.

Did find this, though, in the CRS Reports for 2013;

QuoteFY2013 DOD Appropriations Act (H.R. 5856 of 112th Congress)

House

The House Appropriations Committee, in its report (H.Rept. 112-493 of May 25, 2012) on H.R.
5856 of the 112th Congress, recommends reducing by $29.9 million the Navy's request for $608.2 million in procurement funding for CVN-79, with the reduction being for the following
components of the ship
: electronics ship test and integration growth ($2.5 million); HM&E (hull,
mechanical and electrical) engineering services growth ($6.0 million); trucks/forklifts growth
($2.0 million); ship self-defense system engineering growth ($2.0 million); SEWIP (Surface
Electronic Warfare Improvement Program) block 2 growth ($2.9 million); EMALS
(electromagnetic aircraft launch system) systems engineering growth ($3.0 million); EMALS
technical engineering services growth ($8.0 million); JPALS (Joint Precision Approach and
Landing System) pricing ($1.0 million); AN/SQQ-34 tactical support center pricing ($1.0
million); Nulka decoy system pricing ($1.5 million). (Page 157)

From: https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20130327_RS20643_c537dfd6673529769fe643badc739e06baec8977.pdf

Page 38 of the document/42 of the PDF file
Has a life outside of What-If & wishes it would stop interfering!

"The purpose of all War is Peace" - St. Augustine

veritas ad mortus veritas est

seadude

Another small update. This time, made new bases for the laser defense turrets. I think they came out pretty good.














Modeling isn't just about how good the gluing or painting, etc. looks. It's also about how creative and imaginative you can be with a subject.
My modeling philosophy is: Don't build what everyone else has done. Build instead what nobody has seen or done before.