Random humorous in joke title that means sod all to you

[The Wooksta!]

You know I'm a sucker for Blohm und Voss stuff and this kit was one of my favourites.  I bought one at a show in 1996 and had it together by the end of the day.  I don't have it any more.

Fast forward ten years and I spy one in a box at Telford.  Mine!  Willie was annoyed but relaxed when I explained what was going to happen to it.  It fell into rubber and got cloned.  I cast several, assembled one and then forgot about it.

It was rediscovered recently and it ticks a few boxes, so time for a revisit.

I like the thread title. It stays.

[The Wooksta!]

You cannot view this attachment.

Obligatory box lid.  Toad's packaging was always quite distinctive

You cannot view this attachment.

Box contents.  The white metal has disappeared, along with the instructions.  They were often a highlight of Toad's kits. Full of humour and tips, you got the feeling that the manufacturer was one of us.

However, this was one of Toad's last kits, as his usual casting partners had a falling out and dragged Toad down for a time. The individual who did the mastering, moulding and casting for the later kits was an absolute shark. The quality wasn't there and soon, neither was Toad.
There's a great deal more to the story, but not for an open forum.

You cannot view this attachment.

Some of my clones.  I can do much better now.

You cannot view this attachment.

And progress so far.  The wing has had a few sink holes filled and needs another coat.  The fuselage/tail boom needs some filling and sanding as the transition is a bit crap.

No, still not changing the title.

[PR19_Kit]

'Swing' meaning 'Swivelling'?

[The Rat]

'Swing' meaning 'Swivelling'?

Or the kit is a real toad.

[The Wooksta!]

It's correctly a skew wing.

And no, I'm not changing the title.

[kerick]

Don't change the title! At all! Ever!
Looks interesting. Did anyone ever build this, or was it just on paper?

[chrisonord]

This lools like something I would build too, I shall be watxhing this.

[The Wooksta!]

NASA built a similar thing in the 1970s and it flew.  The Blohm und Voss proposal remained on paper.

Richard Vogt was one to push the envelope of design, with cutting edge proposals that to the layman look completely insane.  No realistic procurement office were likely to put any into production, let alone service.

[The Wooksta!]

Scheme?  I'm going for another late war patchwork camo, with an NMF fuselage with 02 panel lines, 02 nosecone, 81/82/76 wing, 82/83 fin and rudder with a mixture of colours for the tailplanes.  It may get an RVD band on the tail, but I don't know what yet. 

Obviously, they lost, so overpainted RAF roundels and an Air Min number.

I am considering another one or perhaps two, because to display it's unique selling point the U/C has to be up.  The third one would be part dismantled on a Queen Mary trailer.

[Weaver]

Typically over-thought attempt at obscure humour which will probably be misinterpreted as some sort of snarky dig,

I think we should all petition Lee to NEVER change the thread title so that he has to do it just to remain a rebel...  

[Rick Lowe]

Typically over-thought attempt at obscure humour which will probably be misinterpreted as some sort of snarky dig,

I think we should all petition Lee to NEVER change the thread title so that he has to do it just to remain a rebel...  

Adding my vote to NOT change the thread title...   

[kerick]

Typically over-thought attempt at obscure humour which will probably be misinterpreted as some sort of snarky dig,

I think we should all petition Lee to NEVER change the thread title so that he has to do it just to remain a rebel...  

Adding my vote to NOT change the thread title...   

The anthem of old folks...never change!