avatar_The Rat

Westland Whirlwind

Started by The Rat, September 26, 2005, 03:21:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Martin H

I always hope for the best.
Unfortunately,
experience has taught me to expect the worst.

Size (of the stash) matters.

IPMS (UK) What if? SIG Leader.
IPMS (UK) Project Cancelled SIG Member.

NARSES2

That's the one Martin  :thumbsup:

Always thought that was a nice bit of work
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

PR19_Kit

Methinks OGL has a 'thing' about Whirlwinds........  ;)

And quite right too, it's a fascinating aircraft of course.

Let's see a piccie of the PRII please.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Martin H

Quote from: PR19_Kit on October 07, 2010, 11:19:42 AM
Methinks OGL has a 'thing' about Whirlwinds........  ;)

And quite right too, it's a fascinating aircraft of course.

Let's see a piccie of the PRII please.

Guilty as Charged!  ;D :thumbsup:

heres the PR II for you Kit  ;)


and for good measure heres the others.

Whirlwind II


NF I


SeaWhirlwind NFIV


And finaly an export mk I

I always hope for the best.
Unfortunately,
experience has taught me to expect the worst.

Size (of the stash) matters.

IPMS (UK) What if? SIG Leader.
IPMS (UK) Project Cancelled SIG Member.

Weaver

#124
Okay, how about a twin fuselage Whirlwind, in P-82 style?

Exploiting the constant chord wing section, fit a fuselage at each engine position with the engine raised to mate with it, then fit a gun/fuel pod in the centre made from a fuselage nose and an engine pod. Not sure what you do about the undercarriage - maybe fit a nosewheel in the pod and main wheels behind the cockpits in the fuselages?

Quick'n'dirty:

"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

Martin H

I like your thinking. Would need merlin's at least thou
I always hope for the best.
Unfortunately,
experience has taught me to expect the worst.

Size (of the stash) matters.

IPMS (UK) What if? SIG Leader.
IPMS (UK) Project Cancelled SIG Member.

Pablo1965

They are great, Whirlwindis a very special plane, I have doubt about the naval version, because it need a great distance to landing and take off.
In any way they are great :thumbsup: :cheers:

ElectrikBlue

Quote from: Weaver on October 08, 2010, 04:14:03 AM
Okay, how about a twin fuselage Whirlwind, in P-82 style?

Exploiting the constant chord wing section, fit a fuselage at each engine position with the engine raised to mate with it, then fit a gun/fuel pod in the centre made from a fuselage nose and an engine pod. Not sure what you do about the undercarriage - maybe fit a nosewheel in the pod and main wheels behind the cockpits in the fuselages?

Quick'n'dirty:


Works for me!  :thumbsup:
Gun/fuel pod and nosewheel should balance the extra weight of the second boom...  ;)

PR19_Kit

OGL,

Magnificent work, specially the PRII of course.

I wish my Dad was still alive, I'd ask him if he saw any of them at St. Eval.  ;D
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Pablo1965

You are thiking in a twin version without central booms.

Tophe

Thanks Weaver, good creation! :thumbsup: (The model by Martin H was wonderful also, but I knew it)
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

James

The Whirlwind is just one of those designs which you can do anything with. I wish it had had a more illustrious career. I love it.  :wub:

Stargazer

Quote from: Martin H on October 04, 2010, 02:17:52 PM
a twin boomer?

you mean like this?





Built about 5-6 years ago.  And yes Tophe loved it

Wow. I absolutely LOVE that twin-boom Whirlwind!!  :wub: :wub: :wub:

Looks like it could have worked for real, too! Gosh I really love this forum.  :thumbsup:

Weaver

Quote from: apophenia on October 08, 2010, 08:39:51 PM
Quote from: Weaver on October 08, 2010, 04:14:03 AM
Okay, how about a twin fuselage Whirlwind, in P-82 style?

Exploiting the constant chord wing section, fit a fuselage at each engine position with the engine raised to mate with it, then fit a gun/fuel pod in the centre made from a fuselage nose and an engine pod. Not sure what you do about the undercarriage - maybe fit a nosewheel in the pod and main wheels behind the cockpits in the fuselages?

Excellent concept Weaver.  :thumbsup: That'd end up with more airframe commonality than with what I had in mind. (And, to that end, I'd leave her a taildragger.)

The problem with that is that the original main wheels retraced into the engine pods which were below the wings. There's nothing there now on mine, so you've have to do something different anyhow. You could probably use the original gear in a new rear-fuselage position (the leg-top to prop-axis distance would remain about the same) combined with a new nose leg.
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

Pablo1965